Build it They Will Come…
Although historians would have you believe these structures are made for certain purposes, I think they are made out of fear. Fear of these beings which came and scared them so badly they worshiped them out of fear for their own lives, and secondly because they felt if they built them it could in some fashion save them from death. When you begin reading this research, you will begin to note a stream of parallels…death and fear.
Artificial mounds have been created for a variety of reasons throughout history, including ceremonial (platform mound), burial (tumulus), and commemorative purposes. In European and Asian archaeology, the word “tumulus” may be used as a synonym for an artificial hill, particularly if the hill is related to particular burial customs.
While the term “mound” may be applied to historic constructions, most mounds in the United States are pre-Columbian earthworks, built by Native American peoples. Native Americans built a variety of mounds, including flat-topped pyramids or cones known as platform mounds, rounded cones, and ridge or loaf-shaped mounds. Some mounds took on unusual shapes, such as the outline of cosmologically significant animals. These are known as effigy mounds. Some mounds, such as a few in Wisconsin, have rock formations, or petroforms within them, on them, or near them.
The Hopewell culture used mounds as markers of complex astronomical alignments related to ceremonies.
They can be located all across the world in spots such as Asia, Europe and the Americas. “Mound builders” have more commonly been associated with the mounds in the Americas. They all have different meanings and sometimes are constructed as animals and can be clearly seen from aerial views.
There are ‘mound types’.
Megalithic remains, which occur in a great variety of forms: cairns (kerkour), dolmens and circles like Stonehenge, underground cells excavated in rock, barrows topped with huge slabs, and step pyramid-like mounds.
But, what in the world would we need these types of structures for?
In the mythology of ancient Greece, cairns were associated with Hermes, the god of overland travel. According to one legend, Hermes was put on trial by Hera for slaying her favorite servant, the monster Argus. All of the other gods acted as a jury, and as a way of declaring their verdict they were given pebbles, and told to throw them at whichever person they deemed to be in the right, Hermes or Hera. Hermes argued so skillfully that he ended up buried under a heap of pebbles, and this was the first cairn. In Croatia, in areas of ancient Dalmatia, such as Herzegovina and the Krajina, they are known as gromila.
In Portugal a cairn is called moledro. In a legend the stones, moledros, are enchanted soldiers, and if one stone is taken from the pile and put under a pillow in the morning a soldier will appear for a brief moment, then will change back to a stone and magically return to the pile. The cairns that mark the place where someone died or cover the graves alongside the roads where in the past people were buried are called Fiéis de Deus. The same name given to the stones was given the dead whose identity was unknown. The Fieis de Deus or Fes de Deus are in the Galician legends, spirits of the night. The word “Fes” or “Fieis” is thought to mean fairy, the same root as fate (Fado) that can take the same meaning as proto-Celtic bato- meaning death.
Starting in the Bronze Age, burial cists were sometimes interred into cairns, which would be situated in conspicuous positions, often on the skyline above the village of the deceased. The stones may have been thought to deter grave robbers and scavengers. A more sinister explanation is that they were to stop the dead from rising. A revenant is a visible ghost or animated corpse that was believed to return from the grave to terrorize the living. The word “revenant” is derived from the Latin word, reveniens, “returning” (see also the related French verb “revenir”, meaning “to come back”). Revenants share a number of characteristics with folkloric vampires, and modern zombies, if you will.
Although the practice is not common in English, cairns are sometimes referred to by their anthropomorphic qualities. Anthropomorphism, or personification, is attribution of human form or other characteristics to anything other than a human being. Examples include depicting deities with human form, creating fictional non-human animal characters with human physical traits, and ascribing human emotions or motives to forces of nature, such as hurricanes or tropical cyclones. A more recent example is The Sorcerer, an enigmatic cave painting from the Trois-Frères Cave, Ariège, France: the figure’s significance is unknown, but it is usually interpreted as some kind of great spirit or master of the animals. In either case there is an element of anthropomorphism. The figure’s significance is unknown, but it is usually interpreted as some kind of great spirit or master of the animals. Interestingly, a concept of a Horned God.
Another type is a “Bell Barrow”
In the United Kingdom they take the form of a circular mound or mounds within a circular ditch, the mounds being separated from the ditch and each other by a berm.
The Devil’s Humps (also known as the Kings’ Graves) are four Bronze Age barrows situated on Bow Hill on the South Downs near Stoughton, West Sussex.
The Devil’s Humps are linked to a body of folklore encompassing Kingley Vale on the southern approach to Bow Hill. This folklore records how the men of Chichester defeated a Viking war party in the Vale, and the Viking leaders were buried in the Devil’s Humps, giving them their alternative name of the Kings’ Graves, while many of the Viking dead lie where they fell, under the yew trees on the slopes of the hill. Their ghosts are said to haunt the yew groves, and the trees themselves are said to come alive and move at night.
The Devil’s Jumps are a group of five large bell barrows situated on the South Downs. According to the story, the god Thor used to sit on Treyford Hill. One day the Devil saw the five barrows and started to jump from one to the next in order to amuse himself. This enraged Thor, who threw a stone at the Devil, causing him to flee.
A platform mound is any earthwork or mound intended to support a structure or activity. The indigenous peoples of North America built substructure mounds for well over a thousand years. These platform mounds are usually four-sided truncated pyramids, steeply sided, with steps built of wooden logs ascending one side of the earthworks.
American Indians have a history of making mounds and designs in the land of various shapes and sizes. The Choctaw legends reveal that after their people crossed the Mississippi River, they met with a powerful race of cannibal giants…giants who were 15 foot tall! These legends reveal these giants didn’t believe in a Great Spirit…this was the name for GOD/Creator. The Sioux also tell stories about giants who were three times the size of man.
The activities surrounding these structures? Microcosmic rituals based around a “native earth” in which mounds layout and replicate cosmology.
The Mesoamericans were well known for pyramid structures. They were usually step pyramids with temples on top, more akin to the ziggurats. The types of rituals were known to feature human sacrifices. Many of these pyramids were constructed a platform upon which a smaller dedicatory building was construted, associated with a particular Maya deity.
Kulkulcan-winged god…feathered serpent. Kukulcan was identified to Atlantis [Tehuti] — Egypt [Thoth] — Sumer [Ea or Enki] — then later to Mesoamerica and Peru as Quetzalcoatl, who is said to ‘return’. Legends all seem to agree that Quetzalcoatl was tall and light-skinned, with blonde hair, blue eyes, and a beard. His name translates to “plumed serpent”.
The Incas described these “white gods” as wise, peaceful instructors who had originally come from the north in the “morning of time” and taught the Incas’ primitive forefathers architecture as well as manners and customs. They were unlike other Native Americans in that they had “white skins and long beards” and were taller than the Incas.
Why were the Maya presented with advanced information on science, mathematics and calendar systems? Why did Kukulkan promise his return and when will that be?
Accordingly, one of the stars in the Pleiades is called, “Maia”. Is it possible that Quetzalcoatl and Kukulkan are (or were) extraterrestrials from Maia in the Pleiades?
Hundreds of North and South American Indian and South Pacific legends tell of a white-skinned, bearded lord who traveled among the many tribes to bring peace about 2,000 years ago.
Mound/pyramid that glowed! It supposedly had a silver lining…that covered the entire shape. It has six (6) levels. It appears to be the same shape as Atlantis was in its day. Crop circles seem to appear near it, and most of these structures covered in this series. And it seems the overall shape of these of these monuments can only be visually seen from above…from the skies. And obviously these cultures had very little technology which could help them attain such heights, so why build them?
Are the designers giving encoded message? Some have even speculated that many of these designs are specs for advanced technology. Free energy? Aircraft designs?
Build it They Will Come…
The (g)ods are returning…
Tom Horn & Cris Putnam on Hagmann & Hagmann Report Podcast [link]
So, what we have is an ‘awaiting’ of the return. We are in ‘stagnant’ mode, if you will. Awaiting these entities which the elite have had contact with for hundreds, if not thousands of years. From the crop circles which ‘mysteriously’ appear, to the construction of these monuments, of one kind or another…we have ALTARS of sorts. Altars built to honor those who are returning.
The Mystery of Pyramid’s Construction Solved ( Giants Theory)
Build It, They Will Come
We live in a strange world, indeed. Without sounding like a lunatic…wait this is not going to be possible! This subject is far-out. It reaches to the outer dimensions of this time and space, but it’s as close as some of our homes.
Recently, The Holy Spirit brought this subject to me but I put if off. Why do I do that? Inevitably it comes back full-circle. I should know better by now, right?
FIELD OF DREAMS
We can search our history and find many strange subjects but when it comes to the subject of the fallen angels, it’s all cyclical. You see, this is how GOD works, therefore Satan duplicates the same processes only to twist and turn it for his own agenda. This agenda is meant to confuse the masses and the outcome of this has been accomplished.
Murky shadows of symbols and signs play havoc to people’s faith. Conditioning the mind of humanity…
Let’s begin with shapes…
You can do your research on these strange shapes and forms in the fields of mediums of choice and find they have been spoken of for thousands of years.
The Circlemakers of Aquarius
A crop circle was encoded to reveal a message of Ea Enki, who is a God of Sumerian (Enki) and Babylonian (Ea) mythology. A band of southern constellations refer to his name, the stars of Ea. E-A, in Sumerian, means ‘the house of water’ which can also be inferred to as the ‘House of Aquarius‘, the approaching age.
The ancient symbol for Aquarius was the image of a man (Ouranos) pouring overturned urns of water from the heavens onto the Earth below.
The rains of Aquarius, the water bearer, are a gift from the gods that restore life to a dying planet and assure the continuance of the human race.
Aquarius means Waterbearer in Latin. From aquārius (“water carrier”), from aqua (“water”) + -arius.late 14c., faint constellation and 11th zodiac sign, Latin, lit. “water carrier,” properly an adjective, “pertaining to water” (see aquarium); a loan-translation of Gk. Hydrokhoos “the water-pourer,” old Greek name of this constellation. Aquarians were a former Christian sect that used water instead of wine at the Lord’s Supper. Age of Aquarius (1940) is an astrological epoch supposed to have begun in the 1960s, embodying the traits of this sign and characterized by world peace and human brotherhood.
Did you notice? It’s the 11th zodiac sign. The number 11 is the number for chaos.
The Rider-Waite-Smith star card, numbered seventeen, depicts a naked maiden with one foot on the earth and the other foot in a body of water. In each hand she holds an overturned jug from which water flows to the earth below, an ancient symbol for the zodiacal sign of Aquarius, the water bearer.
The fool trump, numbered zero, is the first card of the major arcana. The Rider-Waite-Smith version depicts a young man staring toward heaven as he stands at the edge of a precipice, his small dog yapping at his feet. The fool represents the novice who is about to embark on a spiritual journey. The tradition of the Golden Dawn assigns the tarot’s fool trump to the planet Uranus.
Uranus (the Greek Ouranos) was the first child of Gaia (Mother Earth). As the original sky god, Ouranos became the first heavenly father when he poured water in the form of rain onto his mother earth below so that she would flourish with plant life. Ouranos also impregnated his mother to produce the first race of gods that ruled over mankind. Only when Ouranos became a tyrant did his mother plot with their son Cronos (Saturn) to wrest power from his father Ouranos by castrating him with a sickle.
The sign of Aquarius shows a man with two pitchers of water who is wisely combing these waters. The doctrine of the Age of Aquarius is thus termed the “Doctrine of the Synthesis”, the synthesis of all authentic religions and systems of self-realization. In the Aquarian Age dogmatic types of Christianity will cease to be taught, and all dogmatic forms will disappear. In this age science will become religious, and religion will become scientific.
What GOD did was create the heavens, and everything in it. But, what Satan does it duplicate and twist it to fit his agenda. So, he’s invented the Zodiac. This was done for several purposes, one for the worship of the stars, but mainly because it’s a foretelling of what’s to come….not as you would think but as a sign for the false messiah. Aquarius is the main focus of the Zodiac! Worship of the stars is parallel to the worship of the fallen angels who GOD called His stars. Do you see how it fits into a giant puzzle?
To the esoteric New Ager’s…
Regulus/Sirius rises before the Sun, Jupiter conjuncts in the Moon. These stars are associated with the birth of persons of royal heritage but star seeds come from other dimensions and other galaxies. This was depicted in a recent crop circle Green Street (Avery, Wiltshire) UK.
The Egyptian Sphinx half lion / half woman represents the Leo/Virgo cusp that is opposite the Pisces/Aquarius cusp of the Ages.
Do you see? It’s foretelling of a ‘king’…a royal bloodline? This reminds me of the Merovingian…but I digress. Or wait…is it one and the same?
Let’s question the “Doctrine of the Synthesis”? How does it connect?
If you do a Google search…you come up with this!
“The Secret Doctrine, the Synthesis of Science, Religion and Philosophy”
The Secret Doctrine, the Synthesis of Science, Religion and Philosophy, a book originally published as two volumes in 1888, is Helena Blavatsky’s magnum opus (meaning great work). The first volume is named Cosmogenesis, the second Anthropogenesis. It was an influential example of the revival of interest in esoteric and occult ideas in the modern age, in particular because of its claim to reconcile ancient eastern wisdom with modern science.
Blavatsky claimed that its contents had been revealed to her by ‘mahatmas’ who had retained knowledge of humanity’s spiritual history, knowledge that it was now possible, in part, to reveal.
Who are the ‘mahatmas’?
Why it’s the ASCENDED MASTERS!
After Blavatsky’s death in 1891, numerous individuals have claimed to be in contact with her Adept Teachers and have stated that they were new “messengers” of the Masters conveying various esoteric teachings. Currently various New Age, metaphysical, and religious organizations refer to them as Ascended Masters.
So, in this ‘great work’ of hers, what does it refer to? It refers to the “Wisdom of the Ages”. The “Substance-Principle”. The fundamental law in the system of cosmogony. It supposedly contains all and everything. This all brings the present CERN projects to mind.
The whole agenda is to make people believe that we are all one. This takes out of the equation…THE OMNIPRESENT! GOD!!
It presents to the world of humanity that we are gods…this is the work of Satan from the Garden of Eden when he told Eve she could be.
The core idea? As Above, So Below. This of course is a twisted version of As in the heavens, so it is on earth.
10 Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.
Blavatsky’s second volume addresses the “Root Races”. You see how everything reverts back to a royal race of beings? That mankind is suppose to ‘ascend’ into this consciousness and become as they are…gods.
This is what the whole New Age agenda is about, folks.
When discussing “sterility between two human races” as observed by Darwin, Blavatsky notes:
“Of such semi-animal creatures, the sole remnants known to Ethnology were the Tasmanians, a portion of the Australians and a mountain tribe in China, the men and women of which are entirely covered with hair. They were the last descendants in a direct line of the semi-animal latter-day Lemurians referred to. There are, however, considerable numbers of the mixed Lemuro-Atlantean peoples produced by various crossings with such semi-human stocks — e.g., the wild men of Borneo, the Veddhas of Ceylon, classed by Prof. Flower among Aryans (!), most of the remaining Australians, Bushmen, Negritos, Andaman Islanders, etc” (The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 2, pp 195-6).
But, this is yet another twisting of the Bible! Don’t you see it?
In Genesis we are given the facts…the fallen angels came and mated with humans. This produced the Nephilim…hybrids. GIANTS. These bloodlines were here then, and also after the Great Deluge. These bloodlines are still here. I believe they are the elite who are pushing these agendas.
The arrival of ‘stars’..and we are the star seeds? That what they want you to believe. What’s next? They created us! Of course. This again takes GOD out of the scenario.
CERN will bring about these ideas and fine tune them for the world to accept.
So, these crop circles are but an extension of the ideals. The Ascended Masters.
Stay with me here…
The Rosicrucian Cosmo-Conception or Mystic Christianity is a Rosicrucian text by Max Heindel, first published in 1909. The Cosmo contains a comprehensive outline of the evolutionary process of man and the universe, correlating science with religion.
The Rosicrucians teach that the above referred seven Worlds belong to the lowest of the seven “Cosmic Planes”. The Worlds and Cosmic Planes are not one above another in space, but the seven Cosmic Planes inter-penetrate each other and all the seven Worlds. They are states of spirit-matter, permeating one another, so that God and the other great Beings pervade every part of their own realms and realms of greater density than their own, including our world: “in Him we live and move and have our being”. Proceeding from the physical world to the inner worlds, God – the “Architect of the Solar System”, the Source and goal of human existence – is found in the highest division of the seventh Cosmic Plane: this is His World. In order to trace the origin of the Architect of the Solar System, one must pass to the highest of the seven Cosmic Planes: the “Realm of the Supreme Being”, Who emanated from “The Absolute”. The Absolute is beyond comprehension and, as manifestation implies limitation, He may be best described as “Boundless Being”: the “Root of Existence”.
From The Absolute proceeds the Supreme Being, at the dawn of manifestation: this is The One, the “Great Architect of the Universe”. The first aspect of the Supreme Being may be characterized as Power, from this proceeds the second aspect, the Word, and from both of these proceeds the third, aspect, Motion. From the threefold Supreme Being proceed the “seven Great Logoi”. They contain within Themselves all the great Hierarchies which differentiate more and more as they diffuse through the various Cosmic Planes. In the Highest World of the seventh Cosmic Plane dwells the God of the Solar Systems in the Universe. These great Beings are also threefold in manifestation, like the Supreme Being. Their three aspects are Will, Wisdom and Activity.
LOGOI? Originally a word meaning “a ground”, “a plea”, “an opinion”, “an expectation”, “word”, “speech”, “account”, “to reason” it became a technical term in philosophy, beginning with Heraclitus (ca. 535–475 BC), who used the term for a principle of order and knowledge.
YET AGAIN…twisting the Bible. This time…it’s twisting THE WORD of GOD! Twisting the Trinity…then the Word itself as a path to self-enlightenment. This is the theory of the Freemasons.
SELF…it’s all about SELF.
Sophia is a mystic term for wisdom. Christian mysticism…it involved the Roman Catholic Church. And it does now too. Mysticism means to ‘conceal’. Mystikos, meaning ‘an initiate’. In the Hellenistic world, a “mystikos” was an initiate of a mystery religion. “Mystical” referred to secret religious rituals and use of the word lacked any direct references to the transcendental.
Christian Universalism-all souls will ultimately be reconciled and conformed to the image of the glorified resurrected Christ…but wait….that’s not all!
This is sounding a lot like the One World Religion emphasis we have going now, doesn’t it? The new “Emerging Church”! The “Catholic Universalist Church”!
This is the agenda.
This brings me to the TRANSHUMANISM agenda.
This is the combining of religion and science. Isn’t this what it’s all about? YES.
To have man become immortal without GOD in the picture.
In part two-we will deal with Mounds/Pyramids and on part three-Stones. Stay tuned.
It’s not only evangelical Christians who are sensing that something has changed in the world, and that we may be entering the very last days.
Muslims are also eagerly awaiting their messiah.
In the latest evidence of this messianic fervor, a mainstream Sunni Muslim website has decreed that the Islamic messiah, called the Mahdi, will appear this year or in 2016 and that the Muslim Jesus will return in 2022 to conquer the world for Islam.
DiscoveringIslam.org and the End Times Research Center have calculated that the “first phase” of the end of time will begin soon and lead to the “Day of Judgment” in seven years.
The estimates were derived from “the latest research” into numerical analysis of the Quran, Hadith, Arabic words and historical events,” according to DiscoveringIslam.org.
“The Messenger of Allah [sallallahu ‘alayhi wa-sallam] informed the Companions of everything that would occur until the Day of Resurrection,” the website reports.
“Based on our numerical analysis of the Quran and Hadith, the official beginning of the End of Time and the coming of the Imam Mahdi will most likely be in 2015 (or 2016) and Jesus Christ (p) will come down from Heaven to Earth in 2022, in-sha Allah (if Allah is willing),” the website reported.
The Quran and the Bible put forth end-times narratives that are similar but opposite. The Bible’s antichrist, for instance, resembles Islam’s messiah while Muslims view the Jesus of the Bible as their antichrist or “Dajjal.” The Quran teaches that Jesus returns to earth but for a very different purpose – to “break the cross” and convert the world’s Christians to Islam.
Bible teacher Joel Richardson underscores the inverted end-time views of the two faiths in his New York Times-best-selling book, “The Islamic Antichrist,” and his documentary film, “End Times Eyewitness.”
Richardson is an expert in eschatology, or the order of end-times events, as presented in Christianity, Judaism and Islam. He points to Jesus’ warnings in Matthew 24 and Mark 13 that false teachers and false prophets would arise in the last days to deceive many.
Richardson believes Muhammad is one of those false prophets. But the religion he founded, Islam, must be taken seriously because 1.4 billion people believe in its teachings, which are apocalyptic and getting more so, Richardson said. In fact, it’s impossible to understand what inspires and motivates Islamic radicals such as ISIS or al-Qaida if you aren’t familiar with their eschatology.
But it’s not just the radicals who believe in the Islamic teachings about the apocalypse, he said.
“It is frequently claimed that those who believe these things are but the tiny minority of radicals,” Richardson told WND. “But what the (Discovering Islam) article reveals, is that even many mainstream Muslims now believe that the last days are upon us.”
What is this Shemitah business all about?
Many Muslims across the globe see the unfolding events in Syria and Iraq as proof that the prophetic traditions of Islam are coming to pass and will soon lead to the return of the Muslim Jesus and the Mahdi.
As previously reported by WND last October, an influential Turkish Muslim media personality and prolific author, Adnan Aktar, said he expects the Mahdi to appear in Istanbul.
Aktar said the Mahdi will communicate with spirit beings called the djinn, who will help Muslims prevail throughout the world.
ISIS expects a major battle to occur near the Syrian city of Dabiq between the soldiers of Allah and the “Romans,” who are seen as the leaders of the infidel Western powers fighting alongside apostate Muslims. Some analysts have said ISIS could be trying to hasten this battle by goading the U.S. into putting boots on the ground in Syria.
According to the Islamic view the soldiers of Allah will win this battle, ushering in a period marked by the destruction of the Jewish State of Israel and the dominance of Muslims globally.
Check out Joel Richardson’s two ground-breaking books, “The Islamic Antichrist” and “Mideast Beast,” which have won acclaim from Bible scholars the world over and led many to reconsider the view that the Antichrist will arise out of Europe.
“Even if none of these things are true, there is power in prophecy, and the sense of divine endorsement that this empowers many with will have horrific consequences in the days ahead,” Richardson said. “When Christians think about Jesus warning of the rise of false prophets in the last days, we often think of false voices within the church. No doubt, we have plenty of such voices, shouting ‘peace and security,’ ‘all is well,’ ‘thrive and prosper,’ etc. But rarely do many Christians think of the false prophetic traditions of Islam that are misleading a large segment of mankind.”
As novelist and filmmaker Joel C. Rosenberg recently noted, the greatest danger to the world is not merely radical Islam, but apocalyptic Islam.
“In Tehran, our own president has just agreed to allow the single most apocalyptic regime in the earth to attain nuclear weapons,” Richardson said. “Never before has the term ‘existential threat’ been so real.”
This billboard showing the Imam the Muslim Jesus behind Imam Mahdi graces the Vali-Asr Square in Tehran. It was completed in late 2014.
Another view of the Mahdi and Muslim Jesus featured prominently on Vali-Asr Square in Tehran, Iran.
Truly, the world is entering unchartered territory, he said.
“Now is the time for Christians, whose prophetic traditions are true, to rise up in confidence knowing that the return of Jesus is drawing close, eager to proclaim the Gospel and bring in the final harvest while there is still time,” Richardson said.
Iran’s leaders have been speaking apocalyptically for years. In September 2012, WND reported that former President Mahmoud Amadinejad delivered a speech to the United Nations General Assembly in which he claimed the table was set for a “new world order” based on rule by the coming Mahdi, also called the 12th imam in Shiite Islam.
Joel Richardson tells why he made the film “End Times Eyewitness” in video interview below.
Richardson’s documentary film interprets the events of the Arab Spring in light of biblical prophecy. He traveled throughout Turkey and the Middle East in 2013 to interview Christian, Jewish and Islamic leaders, comparing their views on the last-days apocalypse, including the rebuilding of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem.
In a late 2014 interview with Christian radio host Reggie Sternes, Richardson said he changed the focus of his ministry after the 9/11 attacks. He says Islam represents a major challenge to Christianity, quite possibly the challenge of the age, and most Christian leaders are unprepared for that challenge.
“I’m really focused on trying to educate the Christian Church. Even in nations where Muslims are a majority, the Christian leaders, the pastors, they often don’t know how to relate to the issue of Islam,” Richardson said. “They don’t know how to train their people to respond to Islam. One thing I am absolutely convinced of is Islam is clearly the single greatest challenge the church is going to face before the return of Jesus but really it’s the greatest challenge the world is going to face in the years ahead so I want to encourage people and train people to be able to rise to meet the challenge.
“And to meet the challenge courageously, intelligently, and to give it the time that it deserves.”
Watch the trailer for “End Times Eye Witness.”
NEPHILIM AT FATIMA
I’ve been saying for some time that the whole Fatima event was not as the Roman Catholic Church would have you believe it to be. What we have here is a facade. To me, it reminds me of the fact that so many people will be deceived when these entities do make themselves known…and they will.
Rand is a government ‘think-tank’ society. It published a report (in 1968)which was ‘free’ to view at one time but now…is not. But, I have a link…
Before I place those here I want to acknowledge what this report said about Fatima!
“What was reported? Luminous discs, shields, globes and elongated objects in the sky, sometimes alone, sometimes in large numbers. Occasional descriptions of interactions with the observers are also mentioned, including landings, and seeing and communicating with occupants. The latter events especially were almost always interpreted in a religious context. A recent example is the repreated appearance of a typical UFO phenomenology at Fatima, Portugal on six successive months in 1917. The October 13 phenomenon was the best reported and was witnessed by a crowd of about 70,000 persons, including a number of scientists, reporters, atheists, and agnostics, as well as faithful Catholics.One of the scientifically curious was Dr. A. Garett of the University of Coimbra. Rain, which had been falling that day, ceased and the crowd looked up to see the “sun” now visible through the heavy clouds, Professor Garett wrote, “…I turned toward this (sun) which was attracting all eyes and I could see it like a disk with a clear cut edge, with a vivid rim, luminous and shining, but without hurting one. The comparison I have heard at Fatima with a disk of dull silver, does not seem to me exact. It was a clearer, more vivid, richer color and with shifting tints like the luster of a pearl. It was not at all like the moon on a clear transparent night, for one saw and felt it like a living star. Nor was it spherical like the moon, nor did it have the same quality of lighter and less light. It looked like a burnished wheel cut out of mother-of-pearl. Nor could it be confused with the sun seen through a fog–there was no fog…This disc spun dizzily round. It was not the twinkling of a star: it whirled round upon itself with mad rapidity…The sun, preserving the celerity of its rotation, detached itself from the firmament and advanced, blood-red, towards the earth, threatening to crush is with the weight of its vast and fiery mass. These moments made a terrifying impression.”
RAND Corporation Admits UFO/Nephilim Exist! [link]
The world’s most exclusive club has eighteen members. They gather every other month on a Sunday evening at 7 p.m. in conference room E in a circular tower block whose tinted windows overlook the central Basel railway station. Their discussion lasts for one hour, perhaps an hour and a half. Some of those present bring a colleague with them, but the aides rarely speak during this most confidential of conclaves. The meeting closes, the aides leave, and those remaining retire for dinner in the dining room on the eighteenth floor, rightly confident that the food and the wine will be superb. The meal, which continues until 11 p.m. or midnight, is where the real work is done. The protocol and hospitality, honed for more than eight decades, are faultless. Anything said at the dining table, it is understood, is not to be repeated elsewhere.
Few, if any, of those enjoying their haute cuisine and grand cru wines— some of the best Switzerland can offer—would be recognized by passers-by, but they include a good number of the most powerful people in the world. These men—they are almost all men—are central bankers. They have come to Basel to attend the Economic Consultative Committee (ECC) of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), which is the bank for central banks. Its current members [ZH: as of 2013] include Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the US Federal Reserve; Sir Mervyn King, the governor of the Bank of England; Mario Draghi, of the European Central Bank; Zhou Xiaochuan of the Bank of China; and the central bank governors of Germany, France, Italy, Sweden, Canada, India, and Brazil. Jaime Caruana, a former governor of the Bank of Spain, the BIS’s general manager, joins them.
In early 2013, when this book went to press, King, who is due to step down as governor of the Bank of England in June 2013, chaired the ECC. The ECC, which used to be known as the G-10 governors’ meeting, is the most influential of the BIS’s numerous gatherings, open only to a small, select group of central bankers from advanced economies. The ECC makes recommendations on the membership and organization of the three BIS committees that deal with the global financial system, payments systems, and international markets. The committee also prepares proposals for the Global Economy Meeting and guides its agenda.
That meeting starts at 9:30 a.m. on Monday morning, in room B and lasts for three hours. There King presides over the central bank governors of the thirty countries judged the most important to the global economy. In addition to those who were present at the Sunday evening dinner, Monday’s meeting will include representatives from, for example, Indonesia, Poland, South Africa, Spain, and Turkey. Governors from fifteen smaller countries, such as Hungary, Israel, and New Zealand are allowed to sit in as observers, but do not usually speak. Governors from the third tier of member banks, such as Macedonia and Slovakia, are not allowed to attend. Instead they must forage for scraps of information at coffee and meal breaks.
The governors of all sixty BIS member banks then enjoy a buffet lunch in the eighteenth-floor dining room. Designed by Herzog & de Meuron, the Swiss architectural firm which built the “Bird’s Nest” Stadium for the Beijing Olympics, the dining room has white walls, a black ceiling and spectacular views over three countries: Switzerland, France, and Germany. At 2 p.m. the central bankers and their aides return to room B for the governors’ meeting to discuss matters of interest, until the gathering ends at 5.
King takes a very different approach than his predecessor, Jean-Claude Trichet, the former president of the European Central Bank, in chairing the Global Economy Meeting. Trichet, according to one former central banker, was notably Gallic in his style: a stickler for protocol who called the central bankers to speak in order of importance, starting with the governors of the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, and the Bundesbank, and then progressing down the hierarchy. King, in contrast, adopts a more thematic and egalitarian approach: throwing open the meetings for discussion and inviting contributions from all present.
The governors’ conclaves have played a crucial role in determining the world’s response to the global financial crisis. “The BIS has been a very important meeting point for central bankers during the crisis, and the rationale for its existence has expanded,” said King. “We have had to face challenges that we have never seen before. We had to work out what was going on, what instruments do we use when interest rates are close to zero, how do we communicate policy. We discuss this at home with our staff, but it is very valuable for the governors themselves to get together and talk among themselves.”
Those discussions, say central bankers, must be confidential. “When you are at the top in the number one post, it can be pretty lonely at times. It is helpful to be able to meet other number ones and say, ‘This is my problem, how do you deal with it?’” King continued. “Being able to talk informally and openly about our experiences has been immensely valuable. We are not speaking in a public forum. We can say what we really think and believe, and we can ask questions and benefit from others.”
The BIS management works hard to ensure that the atmosphere is friendly and clubbable throughout the weekend, and it seems they succeed. The bank arranges a fleet of limousines to pick up the governors at Zürich airport and bring them to Basel. Separate breakfasts, lunches, and dinners are organized for the governors of national banks who oversee different types and sizes of national economies, so no one feels excluded. “The central bankers were more at home and relaxed with their fellow central bankers than with their own governments,” recalled Paul Volcker, the former chairman of the US Federal Reserve, who at- tended the Basel weekends. The superb quality of the food and wine made for an easy camaraderie, said Peter Akos Bod, a former governor of the National Bank of Hungary. “The main topics of discussion were the quality of the wine and the stupidity of finance ministers. If you had no knowledge of wine you could not join in the conversation.”
And the conversation is usually stimulating and enjoyable, say central bankers. The contrast between the Federal Open Markets Committee at the US Federal Reserve, and the Sunday evening G-10 governors’ dinners was notable, recalled Laurence Meyer, who served as a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve from 1996 until 2002. The chairman of the Federal Reserve did not always represent the bank at the Basel meetings, so Meyer occasionally attended. The BIS discussions were always lively, focused and thought provoking. “At FMOC meetings, while I was at the Fed, almost all the Committee members read statements which had been prepared in advance. They very rarely referred to statements by other Committee members and there was almost never an exchange between two members or an ongoing discussion about the outlook or policy options. At BIS dinners people actually talk to each other and the discussions are always stimulating and interactive focused on the serious issues facing the global economy.”
All the governors present at the two-day gathering are assured of total confidentiality, discretion, and the highest levels of security. The meetings take place on several floors that are usually used only when the governors are in attendance. The governors are provided with a dedicated office and the necessary support and secretarial staff. The Swiss authorities have no juridisdiction over the BIS premises. Founded by an international treaty, and further protected by the 1987 Headquarters Agreement with the Swiss government, the BIS enjoys similar protections to those granted to the headquarters of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and diplomatic embassies. The Swiss authorities need the permission of the BIS management to enter the bank’s buildings, which are described as “inviolable.”
The BIS has the right to communicate in code and to send and receive correspondence in bags covered by the same protection as embassies, meaning they cannot be opened. The BIS is exempt from Swiss taxes. Its employees do not have to pay income tax on their salaries, which are usually generous, designed to compete with the private sector. The general man- ager’s salary in 2011 was 763,930 Swiss francs, while head of departments were paid 587,640 per annum, plus generous allowances. The bank’s extraordinary legal privileges also extend to its staff and directors. Senior managers enjoy a special status, similar to that of diplomats, while carrying out their duties in Switzerland, which means their bags cannot be searched (unless there is evidence of a blatant criminal act), and their papers are inviolable. The central bank governors traveling to Basel for the bimonthly meetings enjoy the same status while in Switzerland. All bank officials are immune under Swiss law, for life, for all the acts carried out during the discharge of their duties. The bank is a popular place to work and not just because of the salaries. Around six hundred staff come from over fifty countries. The atmosphere is multi-national and cosmopolitan, albeit very Swiss, emphasizing the bank’s hierarchy. Like many of those working for the UN or the IMF, some of the staff of the BIS, especially senior management, are driven by a sense of mission, that they are working for a higher, even celestial purpose and so are immune from normal considerations of accountability and transparency.
The bank’s management has tried to plan for every eventuality so that the Swiss police need never be called. The BIS headquarters has high-tech sprinkler systems with multiple back-ups, in-house medical facilities, and its own bomb shelter in the event of a terrorist attack or armed conflagration. The BIS’s assets are not subject to civil claims under Swiss law and can never be seized.
The BIS strictly guards the bankers’ secrecy. The minutes, agenda, and actual attendance list of the Global Economy Meeting or the ECC are not released in any form. This is because no official minutes are taken, although the bankers sometimes scribble their own notes. Sometimes there will be a brief press conference or bland statement afterwards but never anything detailed. This tradition of privileged confidentiality reaches back to the bank’s foundation.
“The quietness of Basel and its absolutely nonpolitical character provide a perfect setting for those equally quiet and nonpolitical gatherings,” wrote one American official in 1935. “The regularity of the meetings and their al- most unbroken attendance by practically every member of the Board make them such they rarely attract any but the most meager notice in the press.”8 Forty years on, little had changed. Charles Coombs, a former foreign exchange chief of the New York Federal Reserve, attended governors’ meetings from 1960 to 1975. The bankers who were allowed inside the inner sanctum of the governors’ meetings trusted each other absolutely, he recalled in his memoirs. “However much money was involved, no agreements were ever signed nor memoranda of understanding ever initialized. The word of each official was sufficient, and there were never any disappointments.”
What, then, does this matter to the rest of us? Bankers have been gathering confidentially since money was first invented. Central bankers like to view themselves as the high priests of finance, as technocrats overseeing arcane monetary rituals and a financial liturgy understood only by a small, self-selecting elite.
But the governors who meet in Basel every other month are public servants. Their salaries, airplane tickets, hotel bills, and lucrative pensions when they retire are paid out of the public purse. The national reserves held by central banks are public money, the wealth of nations. The central bankers’ discussions at the BIS, the information that they share, the policies that are evaluated, the opinions that are exchanged, and the subsequent decisions that are taken, are profoundly political. Central bankers, whose independence is constitutionally protected, control monetary policy in the developed world. They manage the supply of money to national economies. They set interest rates, thus deciding the value of our savings and investments. They decide whether to focus on austerity or growth. Their decisions shape our lives.
The BIS’s tradition of secrecy reaches back through the decades. During the 1960s, for example, the bank hosted the London Gold Pool. Eight countries pledged to manipulate the gold market to keep the price at around thirty-five dollars per ounce, in line with the provisions of the Bretton Woods Accord that governed the post–World War II international financial system. Although the London Gold Pool no longer exists, its successor is the BIS Markets Committee, which meets every other month on the occasion of the governors’ meetings to discuss trends in the financial markets. Officials from twenty-one central banks attend. The committee releases occasional papers, but its agenda and discussions remain secret.
Nowadays the countries represented at the Global Economy Meetings together account for around four-fifths of global gross domestic product (GDP)— most of the produced wealth of the world—according to the BIS’s own statistics. Central bankers now “seem more powerful than politicians,” wrote The Economist newspaper, “holding the destiny of the global economy in their hands.” How did this happen? The BIS, the world’s most secretive global financial institution, can claim much of the credit. From its first day of existence, the BIS has dedicated itself to furthering the interests of central banks and building the new architecture of transnational finance. In doing so, it has spawned a new class of close-knit global technocrats whose members glide between highly-paid positions at the BIS, the IMF, and central and commercial banks.
The founder of the technocrats’ cabal was Per Jacobssen, the Swedish economist who served as the BIS’s economic adviser from 1931 to 1956. The bland title belied his power and reach. Enormously influential, well connected, and highly regarded by his peers, Jacobssen wrote the first BIS annual reports, which were—and remain—essential reading throughout the world’s treasuries. Jacobssen was an early supporter of European federalism. He argued relentlessly against inflation, excessive government spending, and state intervention in the economy. Jacobssen left the BIS in 1956 to take over the IMF. His legacy still shapes our world. The consequences of his mix of economic liberalism, price obsession, and dismantling of national sovereignty play out nightly in the European news bulletins on our television screens.
The BIS’s defenders deny that the organization is secretive. The bank’s archives are open and researchers may consult most documents that are more than thirty years old. The BIS archivists are indeed cordial, helpful, and professional. The bank’s website includes all its annual reports, which are downloadable, as well as numerous policy papers produced by the bank’s highly regarded research department. The BIS publishes detailed accounts of the securities and derivatives markets, and international banking statistics. But these are largely compilations and analyses of information already in the public domain. The details of the bank’s own core activities, including much of its banking operations for its customers, central banks, and international organizations, remain secret. The Global Economy Meetings and the other crucial financial gatherings that take place at Basel, such as the Markets Committee, remain closed to outsiders. Private individuals may not hold an account at BIS, unless they work for the bank. The bank’s opacity, lack of accountability, and ever-increasing influence raises profound questions— not just about monetary policy but transparency, accountability, and how power is exercised in our democracies.
* * *
WHEN I EXPLAINED to friends and acquaintances that I was writing a book about the Bank for International Settlements, the usual response was a puzzled look, followed by a question: “The bank for what?” My interlocutors were intelligent people, who follow current affairs. Many had some interest in and understanding of the global economy and financial crisis. Yet only a handful had heard of the BIS. This was strange, as the BIS is the most important bank in the world and predates both the IMF and the World Bank. For decades it has stood at the center of a global network of money, power, and covert global influence.
The BIS was founded in 1930. It was ostensibly set up as part of the Young Plan to administer German reparations payments for the First World War. The bank’s key architects were Montagu Norman, who was the governor of the Bank of England, and Hjalmar Schacht, the president of the Reichsbank who described the BIS as “my” bank. The BIS’s founding members were the central banks of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, and a consortium of Japanese banks. Shares were also offered to the Federal Reserve, but the United States, suspicious of anything that might infringe on its national sovereignty, refused its allocation. Instead a consortium of commercial banks took up the shares: J. P. Morgan, the First National Bank of New York, and the First National Bank of Chicago.
The real purpose of the BIS was detailed in its statutes: to “promote the cooperation of central banks and to provide additional facilities for international financial operations.” It was the culmination of the central bankers’ decades-old dream, to have their own bank—powerful, independent, and free from interfering politicians and nosy reporters. Most felicitous of all, the BIS was self-financing and would be in perpetuity. Its clients were its own founders and shareholders— the central banks. During the 1930s, the BIS was the central meeting place for a cabal of central bankers, dominated by Norman and Schacht. This group helped rebuild Germany. The New York Times described Schacht, widely acknowledged as the genius behind the resurgent German economy, as “The Iron-Willed Pilot of Nazi Finance.” During the war, the BIS became a de-facto arm of the Reichsbank, accepting looted Nazi gold and carrying out foreign exchange deals for Nazi Germany.
The bank’s alliance with Berlin was known in Washington, DC, and London. But the need for the BIS to keep functioning, to keep the new channels of transnational finance open, was about the only thing all sides agreed on. Basel was the perfect location, as it is perched on the northern edge of Switzerland and sits al- most on the French and German borders. A few miles away, Nazi and Allied soldiers were fighting and dying. None of that mattered at the BIS. Board meetings were suspended, but relations between the BIS staff of the belligerent nations remained cordial, professional, and productive. Nationalities were irrelevant. The overriding loyalty was to international finance. The president, Thomas McKittrick, was an American. Roger Auboin, the general manager, was French. Paul Hechler, the assistant general manager, was a member of the Nazi party and signed his correspondence “Heil Hitler.” Rafaelle Pilotti, the secretary general, was Italian. Per Jacobssen, the bank’s influential economic adviser, was Swedish. His and Pilotti’s deputies were British.
After 1945, five BIS directors, including Hjalmar Schacht, were charged with war crimes. Germany lost the war but won the economic peace, in large part thanks to the BIS. The international stage, contacts, banking networks, and legitimacy the BIS provided, first to the Reichsbank and then to its successor banks, has helped ensure the continuity of immensely powerful financial and economic interests from the Nazi era to the present day.
* * *
FOR THE FIRST forty-seven years of its existence, from 1930 to 1977, the BIS was based in a former hotel, near the Basel central railway station. The bank’s entrance was tucked away by a chocolate shop, and only a small notice confirmed that the narrow doorway opened into the BIS. The bank’s managers believed that those who needed to know where the BIS was would find it, and the rest of the world certainly did not need to know. The inside of the building changed little over the decades, recalled Charles Coombs. The BIS provided the “the spartan accommodations of a former Victorian-style hotel whose single and double bedrooms had been transformed into offices simply by removing the beds and installing desks.”
The bank moved into its current headquarters, at 2, Centralbahnplatz, in 1977. It did not go far and now overlooks the Basel central station. Nowadays the BIS’s main mission, in its own words, is threefold: “to serve central banks in their pursuit of monetary and financial stability, to foster international cooperation in these areas, and to act as a bank for central banks.” The BIS also hosts much of the practical and technical infrastructure that the global network of central banks and their commercial counterparts need to function smoothly. It has two linked trading rooms: at the Basel headquarters and Hong Kong regional office. The BIS buys and sells gold and foreign exchange for its clients. It provides asset management and arranges short-term credit to central banks when needed.
The BIS is a unique institution: an international organization, an extremely profitable bank and a research institute founded, and protected, by international treaties. The BIS is accountable to its customers and shareholders—the central banks—but also guides their operations. The main tasks of a central bank, the BIS argues, are to control the flow of credit and the volume of currency in circulation, which will ensure a stable business climate, and to keep exchange rates within manageable bands to ensure the value of a currency and so smooth international trade and capital movements. This is crucial, especially in a globalized economy, where markets react in microseconds and perceptions of economic stability and value are almost as important as reality itself.
The BIS also helps to supervise commercial banks, although it has no legal powers over them. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, based at the BIS, regulates commercial banks’ capital and liquidity requirements. It requires banks to have a minimum capital of eight percent of risk-weighted assets when lending, meaning that if a bank has risk-weighted assets of $100 million it must maintain at least $8 million capital. The committee has no powers of enforcement, but it does have enormous moral authority. “This regulation is so powerful that the eight percent principle has been set into national laws,” said Peter Akos Bod. “It’s like voltage. Voltage has been set at 220. You may decide on ninety-five volts, but it would not work.” In theory, sensible housekeeping and mutual cooperation, overseen by the BIS, will keep the global financial system functioning smoothly. In theory.
The reality is that we have moved beyond recession into a deep structural crisis, one fueled by the banks’ greed and rapacity, which threatens all of our financial security. Just as in the 1930s, parts of Europe face economic collapse. The Bundesbank and the European Central Bank, two of the most powerful members of the BIS, have driven the mania for austerity that has already forced one European country, Greece, to the edge, aided by the venality and corruption of the country’s ruling class. Others may soon follow. The old order is creaking, its political and financial institutions corroding from within. From Oslo to Athens, the far right is resurgent, fed in part by soaring poverty and unemployment. Anger and cynicism are corroding citizens’ faith in democracy and the rule of law. Once again, the value of property and assets is vaporizing before their owners’ eyes. The European currency is threatened with breakdown, while those with money seek safe haven in Swiss francs or gold. The young, the talented, and the mobile are again fleeing their home countries for new lives abroad. The powerful forces of international capital that brought the BIS into being, and which granted the bank its power and influence, are again triumphant.
The BIS sits at the apex of an international financial system that is falling apart at the seams, but its officials argue that it does not have the power to act as an international financial regulator. Yet the BIS cannot escape its responsibility for the Euro-zone crisis. From the first agreements in the late 1940s on multilateral payments to the establishment of the Europe Central Bank in 1998, the BIS has been at the heart of the European integration project, providing technical expertise and the financial mechanisms for currency harmonization. During the 1950s, it managed the European Payments Union, which internationalized the continent’s payment system. The BIS hosted the Governors’ Committee of European Economic Community central bankers, set up in 1964, which coordinated trans-European monetary policy. During the 1970s, the BIS ran the “Snake,” the mechanism by which European currencies were held in exchange rate bands. During the 1980s the BIS hosted the Delors Committee, whose report in 1988 laid out the path to European Monetary Union and the adoption of a single currency. The BIS midwifed the European Monetary Institute (EMI), the precursor of the European Central Bank. The EMI’s president was Alexandre Lamfalussy, one of the world’s most influential economists, known as the “Father of the euro.” Before joining the EMI in 1994, Lamfalussy had worked at the BIS for seventeen years, first as economic adviser, then as the bank’s general manager.
For a staid, secretive organization, the BIS has proved surprisingly nimble. It survived the first global depression, the end of reparations payments and the gold standard (two of its main reasons for existence), the rise of Nazism, the Second World War, the Bretton Woods Accord, the Cold War, the financial crises of the 1980s and 1990s, the birth of the IMF and World Bank, and the end of Communism. As Malcolm Knight, manager from 2003–2008, noted, “It is encouraging to see that—by remaining small, flexible, and free from political interference—the Bank has, throughout its history, succeeded remarkably well in adapting itself to evolving circumstances.”
The bank has made itself a central pillar of the global financial system. As well as the Global Economy Meetings, the BIS hosts four of the most important international committees dealing with global banking:the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the Committee on the Global Financial System, the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems, and the Irving Fisher Committee, which deals with central banking statistics. The bank also hosts three independent organizations: two groups dealing with insurance and the Financial Stability Board (FSB). The FSB, which coordinates national financial authorities and regulatory policies, is already being spoken of as the fourth pillar of the global financial system, after the BIS, the IMF and the commercial banks.
The BIS is now the world’s thirtieth-largest holder of gold reserves, with 119 metric tons—more than Qatar, Brazil, or Canada. Membership of the BIS remains a privilege rather than a right. The board of directors is responsible for admitting central banks judged to “make a substantial contribution to international monetary cooperation and to the Bank’s activities.” China, India, Russia, and Saudi Arabia joined only in 1996. The bank has opened offices in Mexico City and Hong Kong but remains very Eurocentric. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Slovenia, and Slovakia (total population 16.2 million) have been admitted, while Pakistan (population 169 million) has not. Nor has Kazakhstan, which is a powerhouse of Central Asia. In Africa only Algeria and South Africa are members—Nigeria, which has the continent’s second-largest economy, has not been admitted. (The BIS’s defenders say that it demands high governance standards from new members and when the national banks of countries such as Nigeria and Pakistan reach those standards, they will be considered for membership.)
Considering the BIS’s pivotal role in the transnational economy, its low profile is remarkable. Back in 1930 a New York Times reporter noted that the culture of secrecy at the BIS was so strong that he was not permitted to look inside the boardroom, even after the directors had left. Little has changed. Journalists are not allowed inside the headquarters while the Global Economy Meeting is underway. BIS officials speak rarely on the record, and reluctantly, to members of the press. The strategy seems to work. The Occupy Wall Street movement, the anti-globalizers, the social network protesters have ignored the BIS. Centralbahnplatz 2, Basel, is quiet and tranquil. There are no demonstrators gathered outside the BIS’s headquarters, no protestors camped out in the nearby park, no lively reception committees for the world’s central bankers.
As the world’s economy lurches from crisis to crisis, financial institutions are scrutinized as never before.Legions of reporters, bloggers, and investigative journalists scour the banks’ every move. Yet somehow, apart from brief mentions on the financial pages, the BIS has largely managed to avoid critical scrutiny. Until now.
This work given is in full acknowledgement of GOD and directed by Holy Spirit. Any and all use of the facts of the dark side are not an avenue meant to give any credit to them. In fact, all work is directly attributed to GODs Plan and to give HIM all the glory. Amen
How do the witch trials connect to today’s events? Who’s behind it all? Do you know?
First, we will establish the connection between Christian Science to Freemasonry; and then the Trials of the Witches to the Freemasons.
What’s this about? This is about possession and conspiracy…there is NOTHING new under the sun.
As far back as man has been here, and even before demons have been here. Man has been fighting them every since GOD placed us in the Garden of Eden.
The ancient Greeks and Romans invited spirits into their bodies to possess them. Using ritualistic dancing and sacrificing of goats while eating their flesh. This kind of behavior began long, long ago and believe it or not, it continues to take place this very day, only the sacrifices are now us instead of goats.
_______REAL SATANIC SACRIFICE OF A GOAT INSIDE A TURKISH MASONIC LODGE_______ [link]
Christian Science is a false religion which began in 1875, when Mary Baker Eddy (the religion’s founder) published her demonic work, Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures. “Christian Scientists” elevated the writings of Mary Baker Eddy as being equal with the inspired Word of God, i.e., the Bible.
Mary Baker Eddy, the founder of Christian Science, was an associate of 33rd Degree Freemason Henry Steele Olcott, who founded the Satan worshiping cult called the “Theosophical Society” with evil female Freemason, mother of the New Age Movement and Hitler’s spiritual guide, Helena Petrovna Blavatsky. Several Eddy brothers held séances and it was at one of these séances that Blavatsky met Col. Henry Steele Olcott. Mary Baker Eddy even married a Freemason and this became the ONLY secret society which she allowed other Christian Science members to join. Also she had her own material published in the Freemasons’ Monthly Magazine.
Oh, by the way, did you know that there is a seance held every year on October 31,at different locations around the world, in honor of Harry Houdini?
During Houdini’s life he made a pact to communicate from “the other side” if possible, and left three different codes with three people, including his wife Bess Houdini. Codes that he would use if he were able to reach across the chasm of death, giving people a way to know it was the real Houdini. Houdini requested that Bess hold a séance annually on the anniversary of his death for the first ten years after his passing. Houdini died Oct. 31, 1926 at 1:26pm. By 1936, the conclusion of the first ten years, Bess had not received their code and stopped holding the séance. However, Houdini’s brother Hardeen was unwilling to quit and the tradition continued.
Hardeen took on a protégé, an escape artist/magician named Sid Radner. Their friendship flourished and deepened to the point that Sid started attending the séances in the 1940’s. When Hardeen was ready to stop, Sid was ready to continue.
The official 2013 Houdini Séance in Halifax Nova Scotia [link]
_______Christian Science and the Catholic Faith by Augustine Matthias Bellwald_______
The empires of the Medes and the Persians either shared usages or inherited them at the time when they subdued the earlier kingdom. Under the scepter, these practices obtained such a vogue that in Roman times, occult arts became all but identified with the Persian priests, or Magi. The very word magic is derived from the Persian and remains in our modern tongues as a historical monument, reminding us of the beliefs and practices of those superstitious ages.
Francis Anthony Mesmer (c. 1734-1815) is the real founder of the modern mind-movements. He is the link between the old and the new, between medieval magic and modern mind-healing.
I find this particularly interesting in that the Magi are part of the three who supposedly came to bear gifts to the baby Jesus and was called, ‘the smartest men on the earth at the time. I think that they were part of this whole witchcraft subject and they are indeed part of the Brotherhood of Light…the Ascended Masters.
The LOGO for the publishing company of this book stands for MEROVINGIAN! Seems to me this is should show a parallel between the Christian Science and the Vatican!! source
Looks like he (MacMillan) was a Freemason. Not surprising!
_______Christian Scientist Freemasons_______
The names below are listed in the Masonic reference book called “10,000 Famous Freemasons” written by William R. Denslow, published by the Missouri Lodge of Research and has it’s foreword written by ex-Usa President Harry S. Truman. Instead of just listing the names and pages they are listed on, I have typed the whole of each article to silence critics who may claim I have made this all up. Remember these guys were not ‘backseat’ christian scientists but played a vital role, some as high as president of The Mother Church. All this information explains why this cult uses a masonic symbol. There is also a good chance that Mary Baker Eddy was a female Freemason.
Erwin D. Canham
Editor of Christian Science Monitor.
Feb 13, 1904 at Auburn, Maine. Received B.A. and Litt.D. from Bates College; L.H.D. Boston University and was Rhodes Scholar at Oxford Univ. England, receiving B.A. and M.A. in 1936. Began with the Christian Science Monitor, in 1925 and has covered many important national and international stories for his paper including the League of Nations assemblies of 1926-28, Ramsay MacDonald’s tour of the U.S.; London Naval conference; trips of American Presidents; nationwide political surveys; inauguration of Philippine Commonwealth. He was head of the Washington Bureau from 1932-1939; general news editor 1939-41, managing editor, 1941-44 and editor since 1945. Mason.
George Channing (1888-?)
Editor of Christian Science Journal, Sentinal and Herald since 1949.
First reader, mother church, Boston, Mass., 1941-42. b. Nov. 21, 1888 at Providence, R.I. Studied at Brown, Yale and Boston Univ. Began journalistic work on Providence (R.I.) Journal 1913. Was city editor of Seattle Star, 1921-23. Mason, 32nd Degree AASR. Deceased.
Paul S. Deland
Managing editor and member of editorial council of The Christian Science Monitor since 1945.
b. at North Brookfield, Mass., he was first a real estate dealer before turning to journalism in 1905. He served as a reporter and a feature writer on papers in Worcester, Mass., New Haven, Conn. and Boston. Has been with the Christian Science Monitor since 1908. Mason and 32nd Degree AASR (NJ)
Alexander Dodds (1874-1920)
Editor. b. April 5, 1874 at Allegheny, Pa. and was a newspaper writer and editor from 1890.
He was associate publisher of The Builder, Pittsburgh from 1894-96 and was later with the Pittsburgh Dispatch and managing editor of the Christian Science Monitor from 1908-14. From 1914-16 he was managing editor of the Los Angeles Herald and vice president of the United Press Assn. 1909-12. Mason. d. Nov. 30, 1920.
Arnold H. Exo
Christian Science Church Official.
b. in Muscatine, Iowa. He was a district advertising manager for Household Finance Corp. from 1931-41, and in 1942 became a Christian Science practitioner and later a reader. He has been 1st reader of the First Church of Christ Scientist in Boston since 1956. Mason.
Albert F. Gilmore (?-1943)
Editor of Christian Science Weekly and monthly magazines, 1922-29, and president of The Mother Church, 1922-23.
b. in Turner, Maine. He was a graduate of Bates Coll. He was first a high school principal, and then with a book company. From 1914-17 he was first reader of the First Church of Christ Scientist at Brooklyn, N.Y. Mason. d. June 8, 1943.
Roland R. Harrison (1878-1940)
Managing editor of the Christian Science Monitor.
b. June 10, 1878 at Smithville, NY. Graduate of Cornell U. in 1903. From 1903-22 he was with the following newspapers: Brooklyn Standard Union; New York Times; New York Herald. He joined the monitor staff at Boston in 1922, and was executive editor from 1924-29, and administrative editor from 1939. He was publisher of the Christian Science Publishing Society from 1929-39. Mason. d. Jan 16, 1940.
Charles E. Heitman (1874-1948)
Manager of Christian Science Publishing Society, and director of The Mother Church, 1st Church of Christ, Scientist, Boston.
b.Nov. 12, 1874 in McLean Co.,Ky.He was first reader of 2nd Church of Christ, Scientist, at New York City from 1918-21, and president of The Mother Church in 1923-24. From 1926-27 he was associate editor of the Christian Science Monitor. Served as corporal in Roosevelt’s Rough Riders in Spanish-American War. Member of Marble Lodge No. 702 at Tuckahoe, N.Y., and 32nd Degree AASR in Boston, Mass. d. Oct. 1, 1948. (1)
_______Christian Science Logo_______
The main logo for the Christian Science cult is also the Knights Templar symbol. (Christian Science Journal, Special Issue, December 1992)
Freemasonry participated in the rise and spread of Christian Science and Unitarianism.
_______Directors Order Diabolical Destruction of Grand Pyramid Marker at Bow_______
When the Board of Directors noted that too many Christian Scientists were visiting the grand granite marker at Bow that marked Mary Baker Eddy’d birthplace, they had it destroyed, dynamited to bits!
Located near the ancient house in which Mrs. Eddy was born in 1821, this great pyramid-shaped monument was cut from the largest piece of granite quarried in New Hampshire, weighing over 100 tons, and mor than 11 feet on each side before cutting.
This pyramid-shaped “marker” was an exact reproduction of the capstone of the Great Pyramid in Egypt depicted on “The Great Seal” of the United States of America, as shown on our one-dollar bills. We know the Great Pyramid was never completed. The “Bible in Stone” never has its capstone, that is, until this inspired gift from the Masons who clearly recognized Mary Baker Eddy as the one who fulfilled Jesus’ promise and prophecy of the “Comforter,” who would bring the Second Coming of the Christ.
_______She Married a Freemason_______
In December, 1843 Mary Baker married a neighbor, George Washington Glover, and moved with him to Charleston, SC. Six months later, they moved to Wilmington, NC where George died of yellow fever. Glover, was a Freemason, and his Masonic brothers paid for his funeral. Acting on the request of the dying Glover, they also paid Mary’s railroad fare to New York, where she was met by her brother George and taken back to her father’s house. In September, her son was born, and she named him George Washington, after his father.
Interestingly, this site reveals a witch hunt and connects Freemasonry to Jack the Ripper murders! http://www.masonicworld.com/education/files/may05/masonic_witch_hunt_of_the_19.htm and here http://www.casebook.org/dissertations/freemasonry/stocks.html
The mixing of religions are part of Satan’s agenda to disguise The real GOD within the idols. Witchcraft has been around for thousands of years and has gained popularity but that’s no surprise considering the times we live in.
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantaility of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
You can’t make these things up, folks!!
URGENT! Mysterious “UNIDENTIFIED LYING OBJECT” Just Showed Up At CERN! [link]