FROGS FROGS FROGS
Upon researching for another subject I cam across some information which just had to be put aside for another article. It was to important not to.
I came across a PDF that I had previously downloaded and kept called “The Coming Race” by Edward Bulwer Lytton.
This book covers VRIL and the race of beings who live beneath the earth. The next passage comes from page 40;
From this mysterious personage, at once a sage and a hero, all the principal sections of the Vril-ya race pretend to trace a common origin.
The portraits are of the philosopher himself, of his grandfather, and great-grandfather. They are all at full length. The philosopher is attired in a long tunic which seems to form a loose suit of scaly armour, borrowed, perhaps, from some fish or reptile, but the feet and hands are exposed: the digits in both are wonderfully long, and webbed. He has little or no perceptible throat, and a low receding forehead, not at all the ideal of a sage’s. He has bright brown prominent eyes, a very wide mouth and high cheekbones, and a muddy complexion.
According to tradition, this philosopher had lived to a patriarchal age, extending over many centuries, and he remembered distinctly in middle life his grandfather as surviving, and in childhood his great-grandfather; the portrait of the first he had taken, or caused to be taken, while yet alive- that of the latter was taken from his effigies in mummy. The portrait of his grandfather had the features and aspect of the philosopher, only much more exaggerated: he was not dressed, and the colour of his body was singular; the breast and stomach yellow, the shoulders and legs of a dull bronze hue: the great-grandfather was a magnificent specimen of the Batrachian genus, a Giant Frog, ‘pur et simple.’
Among the pithy sayings which, according to tradition, the philosopher bequeathed to posterity in rhythmical form and sententious brevity, this is notably recorded: “Humble yourselves, my descendants; the father of your race was a ‘twat’ (tadpole): exalt yourselves, my descendants, for it was the same Divine Thought which created your father that develops itself in exalting you.”
Aph-Lin told me this fable while I gazed on the three Batrachian portraits. I said in reply: “You make a jest of my supposed ignorance and credulity as an uneducated Tish, but though these horrible daubs may be of great antiquity, and were intended, perhaps, for some rude caracature, I presume that none of your race even in the less enlightened ages, ever believed that the great-grandson of a Frog became a sententious philosopher; or that any section, I will not say of the lofty Vril-ya, but of the meanest varieties of the human race, had its origin in a Tadpole.”
“Pardon me,” answered Aph-Lin: “in what we call the Wrangling or Philosophical Period of History, which was at its height about seven thousand years ago, there was a very distinguished naturalist, who proved to the satisfaction of numerous disciples such analogical and anatomical agreements in structure between an An and a Frog, as to show that out of the one must have developed the other. They had some diseases in common; they were both subject to the same parasitical worms in the intestines; and, strange to say, the An has, in his structure, a swimming-bladder, no longer of any use to him, but which is a rudiment that clearly proves his descent from a Frog. Nor is there any argument against this theory to be found in the relative difference of size, for there are still existent in our world Frogs of a size and stature not inferior to our own, and many
thousand years ago they appear to have been still larger.”
“I understand that,” said I, “because Frogs this enormous are, according to our eminent geologists, who perhaps saw them in dreams, said to have been distinguished inhabitants of the upper world before the Deluge; and such Frogs are exactly the creatures likely to have flourished in the lakes and morasses of your subterranean regions. But pray, proceed.” “In the Wrangling Period of History, whatever one sage asserted another sage was sure to contradict. In fact, it was a maxim in that age, that the human reason could only be sustained aloft by being tossed to and fro in the perpetual motion of contradiction; and therefore another sect of philosophers maintained the doctrine that the An was not the descendant of the Frog, but that the Frog was clearly the improved development of the An. The shape of the Frog, taken generally, was much more
symmetrical than that of the An; beside the beautiful conformation of its lower limbs, its flanks and shoulders the majority of the Ana in that day were almost deformed, and certainly ill-shaped. Again, the Frog had the power to live alike on land and in water- a mighty privilege, partaking of a spiritual essence denied to the An, since the disuse of his swimming-bladder clearly proves his degeneration from a higher development of species. Again, the earlier races of the Ana seem to have been covered with hair, and, even to a comparatively recent date, hirsute bushes deformed the very faces of our ancestors, spreading wild over their cheeks and chins, as similar bushes, my poor Tish, spread wild over yours. But the object of the higher races of the Ana through countless generations has been to erase all vestige of connection with hairy vertebrata, and they have gradually eliminated that debasing capillary excrement by the law of sexual selection; the Gy-ei naturally preferring youth or the beauty of smooth faces. But the degree of the Frog in the scale of the vertebrata is shown in this, that he has no hair at all, not even on his head. He was born to that hairless perfection which the most beautiful of the Ana, despite the culture of incalculable ages, have not yet attained. The wonderful complication and delicacy of a Frog’s nervous system and arterial circulation were shown by this school to be more susceptible of enjoyment than our inferior, or at least simpler, physical frame allows us to be. The examination of a Frog’s hand, if I may use that expression, accounted for its keener susceptibility to love, and to social life in general. In fact, gregarious and amatory as are the Ana, Frogs are still more so. In short, these two schools raged against each other; one asserting the An to be the perfected type of the Frog; the other that the Frog was the highest development of the An. The moralists were divided in opinion with the naturalists, but the bulk of them sided with the Frog-preference school. They said, with much plausibility, that in moral conduct (viz., in the adherence to rules best adapted to the health and welfare of the individual and the community) there could be no doubt of the vast superiority of the Frog. All history showed the wholesale immorality of the human race, the complete disregard, even by the most renowned amongst them, of the laws which they acknowledged to be essential to their own and the general happiness and wellbeing. But the severest critic of the Frog race could not detect in their manners a single aberration from the moral law tacitly recognised by themselves. And what, after all, can be the profit of civilisation if superiority in moral conduct be not the aim for which it strives, and the test by which its progress should be judged?
“In fine, the adherents of this theory presumed that in some remote period the Frog race had been the improved development of the Human; but that, from some causes which defied rational conjecture, they had not maintained their original position in the scale of nature; while the Ana, though of inferior organisation, had, by dint less of their virtues than their vices, such as ferocity and cunning, gradually acquired ascendancy, much as among the human race itself tribes utterly barbarous have, by superiority in similar vices, utterly destroyed or reduced into insignificance tribes originally excelling them in mental gifts and culture.
Unhappily these disputes became involved with the religious notions of that age; and as society was then administered under the government of the Koom-Posh, who, being the most ignorant, were of course the most inflammable class- the multitude took the whole question out of the hands of the philosophers; political chiefs saw that the Frog dispute, so taken up by the populace, could become a most valuable instrument of their ambition; and for not less than one thousand years war and massacre prevailed, during which period the philosophers on both sides were butchered, and the government of Koom-Posh itself was happily brought to an end by the ascendancy of a family that clearly established its descent from the aboriginal tadpole, and furnished despotic rulers to the various nations of the Ana. These despots finally disappeared, at least from our communities, as the discovery of vril led to the tranquil institutions under which flourish all the races of the Vril-ya.”
“And do no wranglers or philosophers now exist to revive the dispute; or do they all recognise the origin of your race in the tadpole?”
“Nay, such disputes,” said Zee, with a lofty smile, “belong to the Pah-bodh of the dark ages, and now only serve for the amusement of infants. When we know the elements out of which our bodies are composed, elements in common to the humblest vegetable plants, can it signify whether the All-Wise combined those elements out of one form more than another, in order to create that in which He has placed the capacity to receive the idea of Himself, and all the varied grandeurs of intellect to which that idea gives birth? The An in reality commenced to exist as An with the donation of that capacity, and, with that capacity, the sense to acknowledge that, however through the countless ages his race may improve in wisdom, it can never combine the elements at its command into the form of a tadpole.”
“You speak well, Zee,” said Aph-Lin; “and it is enough for us short lived mortals to feel a reasonable assurance that whether the origin of the An was a tadpole or not, he is no more likely to become a tadpole again than the institutions of the Vril-ya are likely to relapse into the heaving quagmire and certain strife-rot of a Koom-Posh.”
HERE WE HAVE IT!!! The origins of the Darwinian theory of evolution!! Did you know Darwin had a whole species of frogs named after him? Yes, and they are considered ‘giant’ frogs.
The Vril Society/The Luminous Lodge was formed by a group of female psychic mediums led by the Thule Gesellschaft medium Maria Orsitsch (Orsic) of Zagreb, who claimed to have received communication from Aryan aliens living on Alpha Cen Tauri, in the Aldebaran system. Allegedly, these aliens had visited Earth and settled in Sumeria, and the word Vril was formed from the ancient Sumerian word “Vri-Il” (“like god”). A second medium was known only as Sigrun, a name etymologically related to Sigrune, a Valkyrie and one of Wotan‘s nine daughters in Norse legend.
The Hebrew of this passage is interesting. Instead of the plural word “tzefardim”, meaning “frogs” it uses the singular word “tzefardeia”, meaning “frog”…as if only one frog ended up covering the land of Egypt. This tries to explain this occurrence by saying one enormous GIGANTIC frog crawled out of the Nile. It is explained that the frog opened its mouth wide and spewed out legions of smaller frogs and that it was these smaller frogs that covered Egypt.
Reptilian, Nordic, and Nordic-Reptilian as Racial Metaphor [link]
The Nordic-Reptilian hybrid is commensurate with a being which is highly interactive with both hemispheres of the brain, both the logical and intuitive, and whose physicality has been informed by both hemispheres of the globe. We might well see Jesus Christ as a prime representative of such a being if indeed his biological father was Roman (Indo-European) and his mother was Middle Eastern (Jewish), as many scholars now believe.
To further this line of thinking, let us consider the Vril-ya, whose chief concern seems to be the husbandry of the Merovingian bloodline–the bloodline allegedly descended from Christ, and therefore one which could be considered Nordic-Reptilian by the standards laid out above. Apparently, the Vril-ya had a falling out with the strictly Nordic Nazis, whom they had allegedly empowered, over Nazi resistance to the installation of Merovingian leadership throughout Europe, even to the point of attempting to assassinate Hitler. It is very fitting that the Vril-ya claims to have descended from frogs, since a frog is an amphibian, and somewhat of a hybrid, since it is at home in the waters of right brain intuitive consciousness, or on the firmaments of left brain logic.
This seems odd, true but this actually parallels the coming prophecy of the end days in which Revelation tells us in chapter 16; about a force that will cover the face of the Earth.
13 And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.
14 For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.
Perhaps these demonic spirits are compared to frogs as their power will cover the Earth as the frogs of Egypt covered the land. I believe this is EXACTLY what we will see. Demons covering the earth, like never before. Yes, the earth is covered in angels and demons constantly, but in this time period we will ‘see’ these demons!
ISIS (Fertility goddess), HAPI (Frog goddess to Egypt), HEQT (Fertility idol)
Isis was often represented as a frog. She symbolized new life. A frog was thought of as good luck. Now they were dying and fouling everything. Their “new life” was being racked up in dead piles.
Isis = Sirius = Phallic Symbol
Heqet was usually depicted as a frog, or a woman with a frog’s head, or more rarely as a frog on the end of a phallus to explicitly indicate her association with fertility.
The frogs are carved so they appear as if you are looking down on them as they stand at rest the way frogs do; they all face in the same direction (toward the top of the crest).
The author of this site then goes on to explain this design then morphed into the fleur-de- lis around Clovis’ time (Clovis the 1st being the first Mero to convert to Christianity). Now, I found sparse info on this whole‘ frog’ thing…apparently frogs have an evil connotation other than being one of the Biblical plagues. Something about the evil in frog’s breath or something.
It should be noted that no prince of Wales in history has had the RED DRAGON as the official flag and symbol of Wales until the current reign of Prince Charles, for it was officially made the Welsh flag in the 1950’s. Why choose that design and color? We should also take note that the Merovingian Crest also had THREE FROGS, but they were changed to THREE LILIES “the fleur de lis” (Three Pronged Lily is a symbol of Nimrod). The female Merovingian women were given names such as Lilith, Lili, Lillete, etc.
Revelation 16:13 And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.
Revelation 16:14 For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth to the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.
All true European royalty is descended from the Merovingian, and of course these same bloodlines claim to be descendants of Jesus Christ. Blasphemous remarks of course. Although they claim to trace their lineage from Joseph of Arimathea, Jesus’s uncle, and an Irish princess, the Church of England and the Catholics rejected the theory that they are descended from Jesus and Mary directly in the 6th Century.
The fact that the Royal Crest ‘magically’ transformed from the frogs to three lilies is not myth but pure fact. These symbols are seen depicted all over the house of Windsor’s buildings and churches (those in England, of course).
There is some evidence that there was an occasional “rain of toads” or frogs in the region near Stenay (anciently associated with the Merovingian)…
Here’s a legend about how/why Clovis chose to change the emblem to fleur de lys:
“One explanation touches on the legend of Clovis 481-511, who had three toads for his arms. First rulers of Western Europe. They are said to by the priest kings of the secret occult world.
When he had to resist an invasion of the Goths, Clovis promised to his wife Clothilde to convert to Christianity at last if the victory were his. When he gave a battle across the Rhine, at last he found a place on the river bank where he could use the ford, indicated by bunches of the yellow iris –these grow not in a very deep water indeed — and after a reconnaissance, this was the place chosen for his army to cross that crushed the enemy. Clovis understood this divine sign and decided to replace the toads for three yellow lilies.”
Frogs are anciently associated with fertility/regeneration and frogs/toads bones were found in early European graves (perhaps as a sign of “rebirth” or “eternal life”?) Then, I found this: the frog evolves from a tadpole, and is the alchemical reference of transformation. Similar to that of the butterfly for transformation and rebirth.
The carving is composed of a typical family crest design with one frog on top and two on the bottom forming a triangle. The frogs are carved so they appear as if you are looking down on them as they stand at rest the way frogs do; they all face in the same direction (toward the top of the crest).
Then, after much musing, I realized that frogs come from water onto land…
The coat of arms attributed to Satan is Gules a fess Or between three frogs proper, which appears painted in the folio of a mediæval manuscript known as the Douce Apocalypse, created in England c. A.D. 1270.
CHEVALIER, JEAN, and GHEERBRANT, ALAIN. Dictionnaire des symboles, p.309. This work is concerned with giving interpretatIons of symbols, and in this case states that there is a confusion with the frog, which is a symbol of resurrection. And so, once again, the theory comes back to a religious point of view.
“bestea Neptuni Quinotauri similis”
This figure of Greek myth, Nannos, must have been the Egyptian frog god, Nun, who was depicted holding a ship over his head with both hands, with a sun disc/god included in the picture. That is, Nun represented the Egyptian sea-faring peoples (Egyptian Atlantis) who put forth the “frogs” that Atlantean writer, Plato, defined as cities all around the Mediterranean “pond.” As the Phocaeans were said to be one of the first sea-faring peoples, they and their city of Massalia would seem to be a part of Nun’s frog fold.
Nun was equated with Hapi, the bull god, and Merovingians, whose symbol, among others, was the frog, were said in myth to derive from a sea bull. I have a feeling that this bull pertained to the Po-river Boii who became the Pomeranians, which term I dissect to Po-Merania i.e. Po-on-the-sea. The Boii named the Italian city of Bologne, and it could be that Po/Padus river was named by Boii/Boiotia peoples.
When this red dragon merged with Rig up in Scandinavia to produce the Yngvi/Ingaevones, the forth-coming peoples — in particular the Saxons and Angles — were regarded as the white dragon by Geoffrey of Monmouth. The Yngvi were also called “Yngvi-Frey,” and so that tends to make the Yngvi a frog line if indeed “Frey” was a version of “frog.” Frey was, in fact, depicted with the symbol common to all frogs: the ship/ocean.
There is a little sign that Frey extended from a mix of Hercules-Helios peoples (i.e. the British Danann) who came to defeat Geryon, for Frey was given (by Scandinavian myth writers) a magic boat that could change size and even fit into his pocket. This seems to be an allusion to the Greek myth wherein Hercules, when he came to fight Geryon, was assisted by Helios in his providing Hercules with a ship in the shape of a golden cup/grail. Hercules had carried on his belt a golden cup, which could then be viewed as the Helios ship, but small enough to fit into his pocket. An important Hercules-to-Frey (i.e. Danann-to-Frey) connection is the reality because the Fir-Bolg, as the Belgae, did indeed worship Frey, while the Fir-Bolg were British-Danann blood by another name.
Who but the Redones could better translate to the golden Helios cup/peoples that sailed Hercules to Britain? Doesn’t this reveal that the Holy-Grail bloodline was a Redone entity? The meaning of the mythical picture is that the Redones were allied with Hercules in his sea invasion of Geryon’s British empire. And this alliance is roughly the same alliance of the other myth, where Nannos (the Greek Danaans and therefore Hercules) became allied to the Phocaeans, for it was the Phocaeans with the Rhodians who founded a city of Rhode near Massalia.
The next point is that, since the Corinth-based rulers of Phocis were the Corinthian boar line (see (a) previous chapter), the Redones were boars. This agrees with the story of Medea wherein she was depicted as a noble of Corinth (i.e. the boar line of Corinth) but, defeated in war, drove the chariot of Helios away, pulled by dragons (same as Phaethon, I must assume). Corinthian boars therefore ended up in Rhodanus, via the frog of Massalia.
The Mediterranean frogs were said by Plato to be colonies of Miletus (coastal Asia), and my conclusions are similar, that the frogs originated in Thrace and more generally became the Phrygians (not far from Miletus).
Clearly, Apis, and therefore Hapi, and therefore Nun the frog god, were from Apollo and his twin sister Artemis. The Greek Calydonians were avid worshipers of Artemis, and in fact the Calydonian Boar was sent by Artemis to Calydon because the Calydonians were no longer being faithful to her. Therefore, it’s no surprise that, in the Nannos myth, the Phocaeans way over in Massalia are revealed specifically as stemming from Artemis. That would then make the Redones a bloodline from Artemis. One can’t help but identify the boar symbol as she herself, the Gogi Hyperboreans.
This would be a good place to re-mention the three frogs coming out of the mouths of the Dragon, the Beast, and the False Prophet, to prepare the world’s rulers for Armageddon. I had hypothesized that the frogs included the bloodline of the Franks and the Dutch because those peoples were from one stock, and because the Franks are nicknamed “frogs” to this day. But the Belgians too, not far from the Dutch, were of Frankish elements. Nearby were the Frisians, per chance derived from Frey since they were devoted both to Frey and Freya. “Frey/Frigg” easily modifies to “frog” (Old English “frogga”).
Toad in Hungarian is “varangy or varangyos béka [‘beka’ means ‘frog’]”, evoking the Varangian Rus; might they have called themselves after the toad? Hard to believe, unless the toad/frog was a symbol of sea peoples. Toad in Italian is “rospo” [like Rus] and “rascasse is some kind of sea toad in french” (online quote). Doesn’t “ruscasse” evoke “Ruski”?
“Rana” = frog in Latin and other Latin languages, evoking “Rennes,” and the Rhine and Rhone rivers, founded by Redones (I think the terms derive from “reign/rule”). “Frog in Danish is fr¿”, says another website, looking like the makings of “Frey/Frigg.” If that’s not enough, “unke means toad in German”, and that looks like “Ang” but also “Enki,” the sea god of Sumeria from whom mythical mermaids and mermen were created.
Nominoe, first king of Brittany, a Merovingian I figure, was “Tad ar Vro.” Combine that with a family crest appearing on a Vere-information website having three, yes three, frogs!! Hmm.
I suggest, even as I’ve traced both the Varangians and the Franks to the Redones, that “Frank” is the same as “Varang,” and that “Frank” therefore means “toad,” as does “varangy” in Hungarian. “Varangi” may then be dissected to “War-Angi,” for a German toad is an “unke.” This may mean that the Yngvi/Angles were named after the frog, and this fits since the Ingaevones were defined specifically by Tacitus as coastal peoples.
It may be that the frog was named after an old form of our modern “fringe,” as that means “extremity/border,” for frogs live on the border between water and land; the Franks may have been so-called for being on the fringe of the world (in relation to Thrace/Greece). “Fringe” in German is “franse”; in Norwegian, “frynse”; in Spanish, “franja”; in Swedish, “frans.” Some say that “Franks” were named after “free.” Okay, free from those in the center; the Franks were a “fringe party,” leaving behind the family and going it all alone.
Thus, if Frey/Freyr meant “friction,” the idea would seem to be to “rub the wrong way” and therefore to cause civil wars that divide brothers so that one or the other goes to live on the fringe. Certainly the French and Scandinavians were Trojans/Thracians, wherefore the mother of the frogs must be Thrace. For indeed a frog in Greek is a “batrachos” (# 944 Strong’s Greek dictionary, origin uncertain).
What is Ba-Thrace? “Away from Thrace”? Perhaps “branch of Thrace,” for the Greek “baion” means “twig/branch” “as going out far” (# 902 Strong’s).
In Egypt, the frog goddess is “Heket,” a mythical magician who is the same as the Greek witch, Hecate. The latter depicts, to the best of my ability to discern thus far, Gorgons on the north shore of the Black sea. It has always been my hunch that she should be read, “Kekate/Chekate,” in reflection of “Gog.” The witch, Medea, was made to worship Hecate, meaning that Medea and Hecate were the same peoples in different eras. Therefore Hecate depicted Aryans since Medea depicted Medes (it could be that Gorgons were proto-Medes-proper). Therefore, the Revelation frogs will be Aryans, not Egyptians, but not necessarily Medes proper (i.e. the modern Kurds).
Strabo connected Hecate to the Kabeiri (i.e. Kabala) cult. As “hex” is term derived from this witch-goddess, who was also a symbol of the star(s) (e.g. connected to Asterius, etc.,), might the hexagram so-called “star of David,” symbol of the Templars and other secret societies prior to they, have been a symbol of Hecate? That could mean that the Israeli flag having that hexagram as it’s only symbol may be a Gogi flag!!
The frogs of Revelation are used as symbols for three unclean spirits said to perform miraculous signs, as though indicating peoples possessed by demons performing the magic arts. But as they have the power to call kings the world over to Armageddon, they are political animals, not merely your average hare-in-hat magician. God may have used symbols in Revelation not so much to speak to us in our ignorance of mythical symbols, but to the secret-society peoples/pagans who use and worship those symbols, as warnings to them that they are terribly on the losing side. God is not going to destroy these types without fair warning.
The underlying idea in both Hecate and Heket is that they are exceedingly ancient, as for example Heket is viewed as the midwife for the sun god, a peoples (or “mother”) even earlier than Ishtar the Great Mother. Knowing that the myth-writing Egyptians were from the Greeks, we expect their mother to be the mother also of the Greeks, and so that mother of both peoples would be the Greek “Hecate.” She was quite possibly named after the Greek term, “hagia” = “holy,” but I think “hagia” too derived from “Gogi” since “gog” means “high.”
The Egyptian frog god, Nun, was represented by four frogs and four corresponding snakes, one frog of which is “Kek” while his corresponding snake is “Kauket.” If that’s not enough, the Mayans, who I am convinced are, like the Aztecs, a Gogi peoples, had a rain god called “Chac,” who was associated with four men or winds called “Chacs” (to the Zapoteca tribe, Chac was “Cocijo”). The Chacs partook in human sacrifices for fertility purposes (sheer lunatics). It just so happens that the frog was part of that ritual, as a mystic vehicle for obtaining rain…which brings to mind “Rainfroi,” the codeword created by some Vere-family members to depict the royal Vere bloodline at Anjou. Remember that one German word for “toad” is “anku” i.e. like “Anjou.”
In Dutch, the word for “frog” is “kikker/kikvors”!
There’s a saying that when the frog croaks, it rains. And croaking brings me to the dragon-depicted Crichtons who lived on the Crich river in Ireland. Might “Crich” have meant “frog” since a frog came to “croak.” Indeed, the Greek “krokodilos” means, not necessarily “crocodile,” but a lizard in general. And couldn’t it also be true that our English “crick/creek” was named after the frog, since frogs and creeks are found together? Consider that “frog” may be a variation of “brook” (Old English “broc”) since any “b” may be modified to a “v” and that to a “f. As the sound of a frog is also said to be a “ribbet,” see how that reflects “river.”
“Crick/creek” may have derived from “crook” since creeks are crooked. “Crook” means “a bend or curve” and is from the Old Norse, “krokr,” which evokes the frog’s croak as well as a krokodilos. As a frog is not a turn or bend, it makes better sense that it was named after the brook i.e. that may be of the family of words that derived Bryges/Phrygia. Our word “break” can mean a turn or bend in a straight line, but can also mean a complete separation as I think was inherent in “Bryges” so as to produce the fringe peoples called Franks, Varangi, and Brigit Celts.
If we ask why a peoples would want to depict themselves with something so unattractive as a toad or frog, consider the Green man of Roslin (much uglier), or other such gargoyles (e.g. on Gothic Cathedrals) and pathetic faces carved into totem poles. I’m only half-sure that it must be a coincidence that “totem pole” looks like “tadpole”; look at this online quote — at a Scott-Fray website:
“Heket, the midwife goddess, through her totem the frog, and Hecate, keeper of the gate between life and death, also speak to our ability to change states. She beckons us to create a radically new life out of the body of the old…She squats, froglike, akin to Ireland’s Sheila-na-Gig [!!]…she gives birth to thousands of pearls of new life. These eggs, like any woman’s, become the tadpole in the womb, which the Egyptians recognized as a manifestation of the fetus during its first growth…
“In many parts of Greece, Rome, and Hellenized Egypt, archaeologists have found terracotta lamps upon which are painted the sigil of the squatting frog, bearing the inscription ‘I am the resurrection’…Later, tombs of Coptic Christians featured the carving of a frog alongside the Coptic cross…”
“Coptic” refers to Egyptians, but as you can see, it must be rooted in “Caphtor.” The Coptic Christians had obviously been lulled into the occult, even as Christians celebrate the Easter egg, a symbol of the Redone god, Rod. You can see above the egg-to-frog connection, the frog becoming a symbol of the womb, Phrygia likely being that womb. Scott Fray even has a picture of a frog on it’s back, like a woman inviting sex. It has not escaped some that the Fleur de Lis, which some say was at first a frog (it does appear as the top-view of a squatting frog), is a picture of sexual intercourse. Because Rod, the ancestor god, is connected to a witch, Baba Yaga (probably “Gaga”), it connects him (and the Rus) more-assuredly to Hecate.
I sense that “Baba” meant “abba/ancestor” (or technically, “mother”), even as “Nun” (the frog god) looks like “nono” = “grandfather.” Couldn’t “dad” and even “Tad” (de Vere) derive from something like “teda,” the Old English for “toad”…in that the toad/frog depicted ancestors (to the occult, that is). In that case, “Frey/Frigg” may likewise carry the meaning of “father/progenitor.”
Although I know not what this picture of the Celtic Cross represents, it too appears on a website discussing the Veres. It is essentially a Brigit wheel with four spokes, and a rose at the hub, with dragons coming forth from both sides of the rose…signifying two major dragon lines but stemming from one Ros clan. I take it this is a Rosicrucian cross. There are in some cases Rosicrucian crosses that use a circle round the center of the cross. Christianity has been polluted by these Satanists, as were the Jews polluted by the Pharisees. If you like many equate Catholicism with Christianity, you ought to know that Catholicism was stacked at the highest levels with Rosicrucians and Rosicrucian sympathizers for merely the reason that Rosicrucians ruled the Roman empire at many junctions of history.
The circle/wheel is nothing but a serpent in this case, with tail in it’s mouth, called an “Ouroboros” dragon, this representing the global/universal reach of the Gorgon bloodline, or that the universe belongs by right to Gorgons. The Ourobos was “First discovered in Egypt, and later in Greece, it is the symbol of the universe. A similar dragon is his Norse cousin the Midgard Serpent [of Loki] whose huge body circles the entire world.”
The mythical Asgard and Midgard terms may have depicted the Kurds (ancient Hurrians), and may therefore be differentiated as Assi Kurds verses Mede Kurds.
The following piece on Mary Magdalene (the reported/false idol of the Merovingians) is upsetting, be warned. Myrina, Amazon queen of Lemnos, the island of Hephaistos, comes to mind [and do note the apparent connection of the Merovingians to Dagon the fish god, whose center of worship was in Mari of the Euphrates river, part of what I now call Kabala Strip. I’m suggesting that the holy grail line is from Kabala-related Mari]:
“Mary Magdalene is sometimes shown with a fish tail as Marina…Mary is the patron saint of hairdressers, perfumiers, gardeners and prostitutes.
An association between Mary Magdalene and the sea grew up, as it did with the Holy Grail which, according to the Nag Hammadi Codices, Magdalene took with her to France after the Crucifixion. The Chalice also represented the uterus to the cultists (as does the horseshoe), and the wine the menstrual blood. Tantric and alchemical texts refer to menstrual blood by a number of colourful names including Star Fire, Gold of the Gods, and Vehicle of Light.”
That Satanic depravity doesn’t surprise me; it was common among the Templars and other such Rosicrucian groups, such as that of Zorzi, founder of the Moravian Evangelicals. It reminds me of Babylon the Great when depicted with a gold cup filled with the filth of her adulteries. Would modern “Merovingians” be attaching Babylon the Great to Jesus, as his mistress? No doubt. They revel in such impishness. Fools, immature men of sick mind; they rule our world with an air of respectability, and in the evenings they gather to become fiends, giving themselves over to the grossest and twisted sexual acts.
The same perversion was central to the Kabeiri cult, and as this cult was centered at the island of Samo-Thrace, note now that “Samo” is the root of “sammakko,” the Finnish version of “frog.” Not only that, but the Hebrew soft “c” is called “cawmek,” but spelled by one code-wielding Kabalist (whom I’ll quote in the next chapter) as “Sammekh.” As nutty as it might seem for me to tie that Hebrew letter to Samo-Thrace, the next chapter may perhaps enlighten you, where I show that Hebrew letters were used as codes for dragon-line people groups.
It can’t be a coincidence that Samo-Thrace was in the Aegean district of “Ebros,” that being easily a modification of “Kabeiros.” Not only was Ireland called by variations of “Heber,” but the Romans called it “Hiberia,” evoking Iberia in Spain. If indeed the Iberi(ans) of Spain apply to the Samo-Thraki cult, and if true that the Iberians originate in the Tubal region of Georgia, where also Gog ruled, then the Kabeiri cult is likely a Gogi cult, and as we can see that it lingers to this day, it will apparently survive Armageddon, go underground as is the nature of a dragon, and arise again at the end of the Millennium as per Revelation 20 to once more challenge to powers of the One True God.
As I mentioned elsewhere, Hebros was the brother of Kikon, and the two were sons of Rhodope. Samo-Thrace’s city of Samothraki was also called “Kamariotissa,” evoking the “Kamiros” (Cimmerians, I’m sure) of the island of Rhodes. Hecate was a goddess specific to Samo-Thrace, and she was there worshiped as her dog manifestation, for she was a three-bodied goddess (one being the wolf), and this now explains why Troy and the Troad (no doubt the same as “Dryas/Dryad/Druid”), appear as the number “three.” It could therefore appear that Revelation 16 uses three frogs for alluding to the line of Hekate, or the three peoples who made up the Trojans.
According to Peter Dawkins, author of the Francis Bacon Research Trust Journal, it was during this period that Great Initiates from the star system Sirius left their perfect and harmonious realm to undertake a sacrificial mission to our planet.
“The Ancient Wisdom Traditions teach us that these mighty souls came to our planet approximately 18 million years ago, living in aetheric bodies and inhabiting the land subsequently known as Hyperborea (‘the Land beyond the North Wind’)… Establishing this area as their principle home and temple, they then moved across the world to other key areas in order to act as guides and teachers to the young races of humanity. Young humanity was, at the time of this great incarnation of ‘God-men’ and ‘Sun-men’, existing and evolving in areas of the world known as Mu, the Motherland.”
In 1904, Aleister Crowley and his pregnant wife Rose, traveled to Egypt under assumed names, rented a flat and turned one room into a temple. In their temple, Aleister and Rose recited invocations to sylphs or elemental spirits that aid in magic [most likely an alien creation]. Their invocations to the sylphs put Rose into a dream state in which she kept repeating “They are waiting for you.” About a week later, Rose identified the “they” as a “god” whose image would be found on stele A 9422 at the Egyptian Museum of Cairo (originally stele 666 at Egypt’s Boulaq museum). Note: a stele is a slab of stone or wood painted or carved with images.
Note: The image of stele 666 on this page shows Nut or Nuit [large figure of a female] leaning over Re-Harakhty, [an Egyptian deity that is a combination of two skygods — Re and Horus], and a priest. Look closely and you will see Nuit’s body stretched out like an upside-down U with her feet on the left and her hands on the right.
After their trip to the Boulak museum, Crowley was contacted by an invisible entity known as Aiwass, who said he was a messenger from the forces ruling the planet. Over a three-day period, Aiwass dictated The Book of the Law to Crowley, that describes principles of a belief system known as Thelema, based on the phrase, “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.” Crowley’s daughter was born approximately four months later and he named her Nuit.
Nuit (also Nu, Nut, or Nuith) is the speaker in the first Chapter of The Book of the Law, the text of Thelema written or received in 1904 by Aleister Crowley. Nuit was also Thoth’s lover.
Besides The Book of the Law Crowley is most known for his Book of Thoth, along with tarot cards of the same name. Thoth is ENKI’s son [Note: ENKI and his family are high-level reptilian operatives].
Crowley’s Magic to Invoke Aliens
In 1918, Crowley used ceremonial magic [that he called the Amalantrah Workings] in furnished rooms in New York City. The workings were performed to invoke “intelligences” to physical manifestation [intelligences = aliens]. Crowley’s intention was to open an interdimensional portal in the “fabric of space and time” and his invocations summoned a group of beings known as the “Lam.” Crowley drew a picture of the Lam and included it in his Dead Souls exhibition held in Greenwich Village, New York, in 1919. The drawing was also used as a frontispiece [illustration opposite a book’s title page] for Helena Petrovna Blavatsky’s book, The Voice of the Silence [Note: Helena Blavatsky and Alice Bailey have been called the “grandmothers of the New Age movement”].
Secret Societies and Sirius
Crowley belonged to more than one secret society with connections to Sirius:
Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn
The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn was a magical order in Great Britain during the late 19th and early 20th centuries that practiced theurgy, or the practice of rituals, performed with the intention of invoking the action or presence of one or more gods [See: Pentagram, Sirius and Magical Schools].
Crowley belonged to the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn from 1900 to 1907.
Argenteum Astrum [A∴A∴]
Argenteum Astrum or Order of the Silver Star, is the name of secret magic fraternity that Crowley formed in 1907. Argenteum Astrum was also the name of an “Inner” order of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. Argenteum Astrum is also called The Great White Brotherhood and silver star refers to Sirius].
The Ordo Templi Orientis [O.T.O.] or Order of Oriental Templars is an international fraternal and religious organization founded at the beginning of the 20th century by an Austrian industrialist and mystic named Carl Kellner [1851-1905]. Kellner studied Freemasonry and the doctrines of an organization called the Hermetic Brotherhood of Light [Note: Thoth’s Greek persona is named Hermes].
Membership in O.T.O. is based upon initiation ceremonies (or degrees) that use ritual drama to establish fraternal bonds between members.
Theodor Reuss succeeded Kellner and formed charters with occult brotherhoods in France, Denmark, Switzerland, the U.S.A. and Austria. Reuss met Aleister Crowley and in 1910 admitted him to the first three degrees of O.T.O. Two years later, Crowley was placed in charge of Great Britain and Ireland, and was advanced to O.T.O.’s 10th degree.
Pentagram, Sirius and Magical Schools
The Lesser Ritual of the Pentagram (or LRP) is an example of a magical ritual that is used extensively by the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn but which has come to be practiced by numerous other magical schools.
In Egyptian hieroglyphics, the pentagram is associated with the Goddess Sopdet, who was represented in the night sky by the brightest star, Sirius, called the Dog Star [notice the pentagrams on the Rosy Cross from the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn].
The symbol of the pentagram appears on many Knights Templar graves in France, as well as being essential to the architecture and positioning of many chapels. One vivid example is the mysterious shrine of Rennes du Chartres, said to be a center of Templar activity, which is situated in the center of a ring of mountains that form a nearly perfect pentagram.
The early Merovingian kings were pretty strong, like Brunhulde and Childebert, who built the abbey of St. Germain des Pres.
Why Saint Germain? Well, it’s not by happenstance. There are no coincidences in life.
Merovingian SLIDESHOW [link]
SAINT GERMAIN AS MANY
Here he announces the dispensation of Golden Age of Transmutation which is 10,000 years. [link]
No matter how you look at this 10,000 years of dispensation that he is ‘sharing’, it’s nothing but lies. I think these lives he has possessed produced the fruition needed to complete these cycles of transformation. Meaning, it’s all a master plan. And it DOES NOT include saving mankind but negating them out of existence.
He readily admits he has long awaited this time of the Age of Aquarius and the Ascended Masters role within it.
Jesus ‘the avatar’ that they speak of it NOT the Son of GOD, but the false messiah!
Le Comte Saint Germain “new history”-Commander Ashtar [link]
Son of Thoth
The Eight of Memphis
Hermes Trismegistus (Magic of Tarot Whaite-Founder of Hermetic Fraternal)
High-Prister of Atlantis “Zakhiel” (Founder of the Zahiel Fraternal)
Seqenere Tao II (1578 BC)
Theotmosis III (Founder o Osiris Fraternal 1479-1425 BC)
Amenhotep IV (Founder of the Grand Architect (G) 351-1333 BC)
Samuel (Major Prophet of the Architect (G) 1050 BC)
Hiram Abiff (Founder of Salomon Temple 995 BC)
Pythagoras 572-492 BC
Aristoteles 384-322 BC
Apollonius Rhodius 295-247 BC
Archimedes 287-212 BC
Saint Jozef (Father of Jezus)
Saint Alban 303 AD
Proclus 410-475 AD
Merlin (Founder of Draco Fraternal-Draco Ordo in 5 or 6 AD)
Jabir ibn Hayyan (Founder of White (Light) Fraternal (Illuminati) 721-815 AD)
Avicenna 980-1037 AD
Omar Khayyam 1048-1123 AD
Averroes 1126-1198 AD
Roger Bacon 410-486 AD
Christian Rosencrantz (Founder of the Rosa Crucian Ordo-A.M.O.R.C. 1378-1484 AD)
Francis Bacon (Founder of Freemason Lodge 1561-1626 AD)
Prins Rakoczi (Master of the Draco Fraternal 1676-1735 AD)
Saint Germain (Grand Master of the Fraternals 1676-1784)
Richard Chanfray 1940-1983 AD
Commander Ashtar (Founder of White Fraternal and Galaxy Commander 1983-3050 AD)
Ashamarae With Saint Germain
In this next video I want to point out that I think this man is the walking present tense of Saint Germain. You may even sense a change of his voice and personality at 10:00 minutes into this video. This is when I think he allows Saint Germain to enter his body/soul/spirit.
Why do I think this? Notice the accent in the voice. You see a physical BUMP if you will, when I believe Saint Germain enters Ashamarae McNamara. Then Saint Germain says, “Greetings”. This is him! So many signs point to this possession!
This person goes on to say that it’s 17,000 years of history within this deity. I say BRAVO to them for publishing this video! People need to know WHO and WHAT these entities are! They are DEMONS!
Why do I include these within this article? Because I firmly believe he is ONE of the FROGS.
Rev. 9:13-18: And the sixth angel sounded, and I heard a voice from the four horns of the golden altar which is before God, Saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound in the great river Euphrates.
And the four angels were loosed, which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men. And the number of the army of the horsemen were two hundred thousand thousand: and I heard the number of them.
And thus I saw the horses in the vision, and them that sat on them, having breastplates of fire, and of jacinth, and brimstone: and the heads of the horses were as the heads of lions; and out of their mouths issued fire and smoke and brimstone. By these three was the third part of men killed, by the fire, and by the smoke, and by the brimstone, which issued out of their mouths.
Rev. 16:12-16: And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the east might be prepared. And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty. Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame. And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.
And I saw three UNCLEAN SPIRITS like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. for they are the spirits of DEVILS, WORKING MIRACLES.