Truth is inspiring, it is guarded by GOD, and will triumph over all opposition!

Megiddo-Past/Present/Future


tel-megiddo-photo-by-israeltourism-flickr

Project Megiddo
How many of you know that this is a prophecy of dynamic proportions? It’s the end all of all prophetic mysteries. It’s the Armageddon saga…
The prophecy tells us that according to the Book of Revelation, the site of gathering of armies for a battle during the end times, a place which in a general sense is referred to as the end of the world scenario.
The name “Megiddo” refers to a hill in northern Israel that has been the site of many battles. The Hebrew word “Armageddon” means, “hill of Megiddo.” In English, the word has come to represent battle itself. The last book of the New Testament of the Bible designates Armageddon as the assembly point in the apocalyptic setting of GOD’S final battle of good against evil.

BIGwakeup.png

The government has released a document to authorities which hold powers to enact laws against certain individuals who are believed to be a ‘threat’. What kind of threat?
Although this report was released in October of 1999, it’s not the dates that matter so much as the content within this report. It serves to establish a front against ‘domestic terrorism’ but it seems to be aimed at people who are Believer’s of GOD. Sure, we have those who are part of groups which fall into this category of tactical extremes meant to defy the government but what I am speaking of is a front specifically against people who believe in GOD and HIS Laws and Design for prophecy as it pertains to the end days.
Specific details concerning people who believe in the New World Order and the objectives of the elite who rule its agenda is the exact description within this document of which I am referring to. The constant blending of Satan’s army (world government) against the people of GOD is something which is given in detail.
“For over four thousand years, MEGIDDO, a hill in northern Israel, has been the site of many battles. Ancient cities were established there to serve as a fortress on the plain of Jezreel to guard a mountain pass. As Megiddo was built and rebuilt, one city upon the other, a mound or hill was formed. The Hebrew word “Armageddon” means “hill of Megiddo.” In English, the word has come to represent battle itself. The last book in the New Testament of the Bible designates Armageddon as the assembly point in the apocalyptic setting of God’s final and conclusive battle against evil. The name “Megiddo” is an apt title for a project that analyzes those who believe the year 2000 will usher in the end of the world and who are willing to perpetrate acts of violence to bring that end about.”
“Under this hypothetical NWO/One World Government, the following events are to take place: 1) private property rights and private gun ownership will be abolished; 2) all national, state and local elections will become meaningless, since they will be controlled by the UN; 3) the U.S. Constitution will be supplanted by the UN charter; 4) only approved churches and other places of worship will be permitted to operate and will become appendages of the One World Religion, which will be the only legitimate doctrine of religious beliefs and ethical values; 5) home schooling will be outlawed and all school curriculum will need to be approved by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO); and 6) American military bases and other federal facilities will be used as concentration camps by the UN to confine those patriots, including the militias, who defy the NWO. Other groups beside the UN that are often mentioned as being part of the NWO conspiracy theory are Jews, Communists, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers and the Trilateral Commission. Law enforcement officials will probably notice different versions of this theory, depending upon the source.”

Celebrity-Big-Brother-eye-for-the-2015-series-revealed

What’s really scary is these things are really taking shape, but if you ‘believe’ they are then your an extremist!
The seedline is even identified as a threat theory:
“Christian Identity is an ideology which asserts that the white Aryan race is God’s chosen race and that whites comprise the ten lost tribes of Israel. There is no single document that expresses this belief system. Adherents refer to the Bible to justify their racist ideals. Interpreting the Book of Genesis, Christian Identity followers assert that Adam was preceded by other, lesse races, identified as “the beasts of the field” (Gen. 1:25). Eve was seduced by the snake (Satan) and gave birth to two seed lines: Cain, the direct descendent of Satan and Eve, and Able, who was of good Aryan stock through Adam. Cain then became the progenitor of the Jews in his subsequent matings with the non-Adamic races. Christian Identity adherents believe the Jews are predisposed to carry on a conspiracy against the Adamic seed line and today have achieved almost complete control of the earth. This is referred to as the two-seedline doctrine, which provides Christian Identity followers with a biblical justification for hatred.”
Many of the comments are based around RACE. I believe this is meant to direct people into thoughts of revolutionary acts against one another.
“The view of what Armageddon will be varies among Christian Identity believers. Some contend there will be a race war in which millions will die; others believe that the United Nations, backed by Jewish representatives of the anti-Christ, will take over the country and promote a New World Order. One Christian Identity interpretation is that white Christians have been chosen to watch for signs of the impending war in order to warn others. They are to then physically struggle with the forces of evil against sin and other violations of God’s law (i.e., race-mixing and internationalism); many will perish, and some of God’s chosen will be forced to wear the Mark of the Beast to participate in business and commerce. After the final battle is ended and God’s kingdom is established on earth, only then will the Aryan people be recognized as the one and true Israel.
Christian Identity adherents believe that God will use his chosen race as his weapons to battle the forces of evil. Christian Identity followers believe they are among those chosen by God to wage this battle during Armageddon and they will be the last line of defense for the white race and Christian America. To prepare for these events, they engage in survivalist and paramilitary training, storing foodstuffs and supplies, and caching weapons and ammunition.”

know-your-enemy

It is about bloodlines…it’s about a fallen race of entities who mixed their blood with humanity. It’s about Satan mixing his bloodline with Eve…and trying to stop Jesus Christ from being born. I know it does sound crazy. But, they called Jesus Christ an extremist…and so much more. He was thought to be crazy too. He told us we would be treated in much the same manner.
Granted there are people out there that have the same views as some of us, who are willing to go to extremes to prove it. But the majority of us who have these ‘conspiracy theories’ are harmless people who want peace as Jesus Christ describes. We truly love others and want the world to follow Jesus Christ, The One and Only Path to the Heavenly Creator.

http://www.constitution.org/y2k/megiddo.pdf

21 responses

  1. Just curious – If you believe the “serpent seedline” garbage, you go directly against the Bible. All humans are Adamic, since when Adam died, ALL died. Just as in Adam ALL died, so in Jesus ALL are made alive. No one will perish, but each in their own order. The serpent seedline garbage necessitates that some are not saveable. If some are not able to be saved, He died for nothing.

    Christian Identity is nothing but a “Biblcal” excuse for racism.

    May 12, 2015 at 5:22 PM

    • In fact~ It parallels what the Bible says…Eve was beguiled. There is no line spoken of about Cain…why? GOD created all and HE loves them but HE cannot rule our immortality…free will does. This is choice…you know like the choices you make to come here and harass people. Same thing…Satan loves to harass.

      May 13, 2015 at 6:11 AM

      • Asking questions is harrassment? Laughable. I only point out things that should be pointed out. For some reason, you do seem to think that your Bible interpretation Truth with a “capital T”. Well it is not, especially when you add things to the Bible that are not there. Others have just as valid interpretations, especially when theirs are actually backed up by the Bible itself, and not added to or taking away from it.

        Jesus died for ALL. That means all are saveable. The serpent seedline idea directly flies in the face of that very simple Truth. It also engenders “Biblical” racism, as already stated.

        Yet when called on it, instead of actually intelligently arguing your point from a place of Biblical Truth, you simply sidestep and accuse anyone who questions you as being in line with satan.

        Cain was conceived outside of the Garden, just like Abel: “Adam knew his wife Eve, and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.”.
        Do you even see a break in this sentence, or is this one sentence? One sentence implies a continuity of an act: Adam had sex with Eve, she conceived as a result, and Cain was born as a result. The exact sentence structure is used when Cain “knew his wife, and she conceived, and bare Enoch.”. Do you understand sentence structure?

        Now let’s look at the Hebrew…
        Conceived – Harah, came to be with child, became pregnant
        Bare – yalad, bear, give birth, became the father, bring forth
        Said – amar, declared, boasted, said
        Man – ish, man
        Lord – YHVH
        Why would Eve boast about getting a man “from the Lord”? Is satan “from the Lord”? If she had a son from satan, what is there to boast about that? Why the emphasis on saying she ”
        Cain was “ish”, a man. He was not a hybrid of serpent and man. He was fully human.

        There is no line spoken of about Cain? Really?
        Cain and his wife had Enoch, and Enoch had Erad, and Irad Mehujael…
        Cain is not named in the Sethian line, because the Sethian line led directly to the Israelites. Seth is also the youngest son of Adam and Eve. A consistent theme in the Bible is that the older shall serve the younger, and God consistently uses the youngest son for His purposes, not the oldest. The promise consistently comes through the youngest son. It is not unusual then, that Seth’s line is again emphasized, and yet we acknowledge again that Cain’s line is also detailed elsewhere, using the same sentence structure and Hebrew as that of Cain’s birth from Adam and Eve.

        I could cite more reasons the serpent seedline is bunk but why waste the time? Plenty above in simple Hebrew and English.

        Your “theory” is more in line with false demiurgic gnostic and false jewish kabalistic doctrines. The idea of Cain being the product of Eve and satan are directly attributable to early jewish midrashic texts, as well as the Zohar. Are midrashic texts and the Zohar and ideas more important to you than the Bible? Seems so, and in so doing, you add to the Bible. That’s a no no isn’t it??

        When you find your position untenable and unarguable, you like to attack and accuse others of being in line with satan. Funny that you should jump to that conclusion, since that is exactly where the serpent seedline garbage comes from, and relies on twisting the Bible and adding to it instead of taking it for what it says.

        May 13, 2015 at 9:18 AM

      • The Bible SPECIFICALLY says the fallen ones are not going to be saved. Also GOD knows who is and is not HIS.

        May 13, 2015 at 7:09 PM

      • Also – “God created them all”? Then what is the point of a serpent seed line? Did God create the nephilim and giants hybrids too? If so, doesn’t God love them? Why aren’t they saveable?

        To believe a “serpent seedline”, would imply Cain was a hybrid. Do you believe he was a hybrid? There is no other position possible with this garbage theory, if satan had sex with Eve, is there? Yet he is called “man”, not “giant”, nor “nephilim”. As a man, he and his line are fully saveable. They are fully saveable, because those descended from Cain are fully human.

        Cain’s descendants are saveable, because they were created by God and are fully human. If created by God and fully human, they could not be literal physical offspring that resulted from satan having sex with Eve. satan was not human, therefore any offspring would be a hybrid.

        Sorry to say – You just argued yourself out of your untenable position.

        Please stop posting your untenable, unBiblical theories as “Truth”, for they are not, and you may lead many astray. You fancy yourself a teacher from your blog pulpit, and as a teacher, you are held to a higher standard aren’t you, and will be judged more harshly, correct?

        Woe to those who lead Christ’s little children astray, for it would be better for them not to be born.

        May 13, 2015 at 9:57 AM

      • I am NOT specifying who (humans) is and is not SAVED. This is NOT my place. I am merely pointing out there are bloodlines which are hybrids. And your words don’t bother me. Yes, I am JUDGED by GOD and no one else, that’s why your words do not bother me.

        May 13, 2015 at 7:11 PM

      • You may not have “specified who humans or saved” were in specific language. But this is because you try and dance around the proofs that I have stated that show you are completely and totally wrong.

        However, you have clearly stated elsewhere on your blog that Cain was the product of the union of satan and Eve. “If” satan and Eve joined in union of sex, this would clearly make him a hybrid, since Eve was human and satan was not. You are not unintelligent, so obviously you know this. You may not have specifically said it because perhaps you were not questioned before on the specific sentence structure and Hebrew words, stating specifically that Adam and Eve had sex and the result was Cain, fully human.

        Hybrids as a result of fallen angels with human women, yes. Cain being offspring of Eve and satan, no, he was fully human, from Adam and Eve.

        I honestly do not care if my words bother you or not. However, I DO care that you lead others astray by stating your false and unBiblical theory that Cain is the son of satan and Eve when it is entirely clear from the Bible itself that you are wrong, and you are adding to the Bible using ideas from false demiurgic gnosticism, and jewish midrashic and Zohar texts.

        That you do not care that you lead others astray, and add to the Bible, is not only concerning, but appalling. Again, as someone who fancies themselves to speak and teach from a blog pulpit, you are pompous, presumptive, and in the ways above mentioned, actually dangerous to those not mature enough to discern your misleadings.

        May 15, 2015 at 1:58 PM

      • Q: If the fallen angels can have sex with humans…which you so readily admit…why not Satan? He is a fallen angel. Case & Point.

        May 16, 2015 at 6:13 AM

      • If the elite are such experts at keeping certain knowledge hidden, why not this? Seems many people overlook the hybrid theory about the fallen ones…so keeping this out is just one more straw in the hat. JS…

        May 16, 2015 at 6:15 AM

      • Hmmm, never said satan cannot have sex with humans. I did say however, is that he did not have sex with Eve and produce Cain. It is not in the Bible. The plain Hebrew and sentence structure indicate Cain is the son of Adam and Eve, fully human and not a hybrid. Cain’s only failing was his evil use of free will, much like many humans fail today, and from the Original Sin which he inherited from his parents Adam and Eve, and which is the sickness that affects ALL humans today, which has caused death to ALL humans, of which Jesus fixes to bring Life to ALL humans.

        It is only extra-Biblical texts and pseudographia, and false demiurgic gnostic texts, as well as the jewish Zohar and midrashic texts that indicate so, that Eve had sex with satan and produced Cain. Not. Biblical. Period. Case and point as you said.

        You add to the Bible and push ideas that are not Biblical. How do you not see this as an issue??

        If “elite” are so capable of keeping knowledge hidden, why not this? Well since the Bible has already stated fallen angels came into the daughters of men, much later than Cain in Genesis 6, this is so. This is plain and not hidden.

        Is that “Cain is the son of Eve and satan” hidden by the “elite”? No it isn’t “hidden”, it is plainly stated in NON BIBLICAL sources! From which you get this idea! For it to be in the Bible, WHERE? Unless you contend the Bible has been corrupted, Genesis has been corrupted, is NOT God’s pure Word, and the Bible leads astray as it is now written? Therefore NON Biblical texts are MORE accurate?

        Is this what you contend? This must be the case, since you push these ideas that are NOT Biblical.

        Please, if that is not the case, tell how so?

        May 16, 2015 at 8:20 AM

      • It’s simple…you nor I know everything. I have theories…so do you. Period.

        May 17, 2015 at 6:13 AM

      • The simplicity of the Bible only adds to it’s glory…but on the other end of the spectrum…it’s deep! Many of the parables, and prophecies are expounded upon by people who GOD gives the ability. I don’t believe you nor I can judge who this is. But yet, you seem to think you can judge. Ultimately, I am given to only One and this is not you.
        I don’t pretend to be anyone special, nor am I saying I’m a nobody…I am a child of GOD. I will be judged by HIM. You don’t need to remind me of this for I am a sinner just like you. I humble myself daily before HIS Glory.
        You spend so much time trying to dispel my work…to hurt a ‘fellow’ Believer….is this right in GOD’S eyes? I don’t believe so.

        May 17, 2015 at 6:21 AM

    • No actually I spend so much time dispelling ADDING TO THE WORD OF GOD. You have theories? I have understanding that comes from the BIBLE.

      You do not answer the valid questions, which shows you are aware I am correct.

      WHY do you add to the Bible and pretend it is Truth?
      You certainly push it as Truth, extra-Biblical, ideas that are found NOWHERE in God’s Word.

      As a “teacher”, you will be held to a higher standard. Why do you not care?

      Again – please answer clearly this time. WHY do you add to the Bible and push it as “Truth”???

      May 17, 2015 at 6:49 PM

      • I did not place the word….beguiled into the Bible. I did not leave out the descendants of Cain. There are signs…just as with parables which lead you to the Truth. I’m done debating your issue because I’m not the one who has a problem with it….you do. I have more important things to do.
        Secondly…if your so concerned with my immortal soul, then why not pray and TRUST GOD to take care of it? LET GO! LET GOD…handle me because you’re not GOD and you’re not to judge me. So with that…I leave you.

        May 17, 2015 at 10:34 PM

      • Indeed my friend, you did not leave out Cain’s line of descendants, nor did God. Hmm let’s see what we find in Genesis 4 of the Bible that I and everyone else reads but clearly you do not:
        4 Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, “I have gotten[a] a man with the help of the Lord.”
        17 Cain knew his wife, and she conceived and bore Enoch. When he built a city, he called the name of the city after the name of his son, Enoch. 18 To Enoch was born Irad, and Irad fathered Mehujael, and Mehujael fathered Methushael, and Methushael fathered Lamech.
        25 And Adam knew his wife again, and she bore a son and called his name Seth, for she said, “God has appointed[g] for me another offspring instead of Abel, for Cain killed him.”
        Yes I put Adam “knowing” his wife and bearing Cain, Abel and Seth, and Cain “knowing” his wife and bearing Enoch to once again show the identical sentence structure, of, husband knowing wife ie. Having sex, and the resultant children being born from those joinings to indicate yet again, Cain is Adam’s son.

        Oh and what also do we find here? Hmm, seems to be Cain’s line of descendants doesn’t it? Isn’t that the line you said you did not put in there? Well you didn’t, but God DID, didn’t He?? The reason for Cain’s line being listed separately from Seth’s, as indicated before, is because Cain’s line did not lead to Jesus, but Seth’s did, as the promise ALWAYS comes through the youngest son!

        And now let’s look at the definition of “beguile”. I see nothing here about sex do you?
        be·guiledbe·guil·ing
        transitive verb
        1 :to lead by deception
        2 :hoodwink
        3 :to while away especially by some agreeable occupation; also :divert 2
        4 :to engage the interest of by or as if by guile

        The Bible is VERY clear, the only thing that took place in the Garden was beguiling by deception, not sex. Consider also, there was no “guile” found in Jesus mouth – is that word there, referring to “deception” or “sex”??

        Now let’s see the Strong’s word from Genesis 3:13 where Eve was “beguiled”:
        Strong: H5377
        Orig: a primitive root; to lead astray, i.e. (mentally) to delude, or (morally) to seduce:–beguile, deceive, X greatly, X utterly.
        Oh there we go again – she was totally, utterly beguiled, deceived, led astray. Hmmm, the Strong’s concordance concurs with the dictionary definition, which also entirely concurs with the context of the Biblical text, she was seduced by LIES, not sex with satan.

        Unless you also propose, since Eve was “beguiled” and ate the fruit, sex with satan as you contend, well Adam ate the fruit too didn’t he? Did he have sex with satan too??? Was Adam the world’s first homosexual??

        Also, did you notice that Eve having sex to bare Cain was OUTSIDE of the Garden, but the fruit and beguiling, was INSIDE the Garden? Does this not also show, two completely and totally unrelated events in two separate places? Or was Eve with satan outside of the Garden? There’s no indication of that in Genesis, not anywhere. If it was in the Garden, well Adam must be homosexual as above indicated?

        There are “signs”? Signs? Really??? Some people see signs in a peanut butter sandwich, don’t they? Maybe this is where you get your “signs”? Or God knows where, but your “signs” certainly are not in the Bible. Why would anyone trust your “signs” over the Bible? Why your “signs”? Anyone can get “signs”, are they trustworthy? Are yours, because you’re you, or God chose you specially over anyone else, and over His own Word?

        What does the Bible SAY? Is it something special only you can decipher, or are given “special” understanding of, that the rest of us poor sods are left out of, and we are obviously led astray by reading the Bible as written and inspired by God Himself? If what you say or your “theories” are more important than the Bible and what God Himself says, have at it! It only says more about you, that you believe your “signs”, based on who-knows-what and gotten-from-even-God-doesnt-know-where-since-its-not-His-Bible, are more important than what He says Himself.

        You really are grasping at straws. You will not spend any more time on this, because you are aware you are wrong, add to God’s Word the Bible, and in so doing, lead astray. It is quite sad, actually.

        Hmmmkay.

        May 18, 2015 at 12:12 AM

      • I am not wasting another minute…no not another second on this. You’re obviously going to continue to harass this site…so have fun by your self.

        May 18, 2015 at 8:56 AM

      • You ask me if something is right in God’s eyes; I seek not to “hurt” a fellow believer, but to correct and bring to correct understanding based on what is in the Bible.

        So I also ask again… Is it right to add to God’s Word, the Bible, something that is NOT there, you have to grasp at straws to even begin to think of, and you have to “detail” by going to NON Bibical sources?

        May 18, 2015 at 12:17 AM

      • And if you DO humble yourself to God, why not be humble enough to ask Him to show you how to understand His plain words in His own Word, instead of believing your “signs” are more reliable?

        May 18, 2015 at 12:19 AM

      • And you continue to have fun with your delusion that “God” gives you “signs” that contradict His Bible.

        Your end will be as your means.

        May 18, 2015 at 11:18 AM

      • So be it.

        May 18, 2015 at 1:44 PM

      • Deuteronomy 4:2 – Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.

        Proverbs 30:5-6 – Every word of God [is] pure: he [is] a shield unto them that put their trust in him.  

        Revelation 22:18 – For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

        Deuteronomy 12:32 – What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.

        Revelation 22:19 – And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and [from] the things which are written in this book.

        Matthew 24:24 – For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if [it were] possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

        Deuteronomy 13:1-10 – If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder,  

        Your “signs” are more important than the plain word of the Bible, adding to what God says… I hope you have time and smarts to repent of your pompousness before the words above come to pass on you.

        Good day.

        May 19, 2015 at 7:23 AM

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s